The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture.
Open accessAbstract
Longitudinal studies have shown that individuals lose bone mineral at unequal rates with aging. It has been postulated that individuals with the more rapid rates of loss constitute a separate population having an increased risk for developing fractures, i.e., osteoporosis. To examine this postulate, we made a search for a separate population of elderly women using a precise and objective measurement technique of bone mineral, photon absorptiometry. Bone mineral content (BMC) was measured in the radius of 571 Caucasian females who were age 50 or older. It was found that BMC values adjusted for width had a normal distribution in all decades and the variation in BMC values did not increase with age. Subjects with vertebral fractures (n = 108) were estimated to be losing bone mineral at the same rate as those without vertebral fractures (n= 161). Thus evidence for a separate population of rapid losers of bone mineral was not found. Reconciliation of longitudinal studies which show unequal rates of loss with the present population survey, in which evidence for unequal rates was not found, would require that (a) the rate of loss of bone mineral for an individual is not constant and/or (b) the rate of mineral loss is proportional to the amount of mineral present at maturity. The incidence of vertebral fractures was inversely proportional to BMC values. In a group of 278 women followed for 470 subject-yr, the incidence of all fractures during the study (n = 31) was also inversely proportional to BMC. These data suggest that the BMC values of osteoporotics would be at the lower end of normally distributed values for the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone
Kusumbe, A. P., Ramasamy, S. K., & Adams, R. H. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13145 · Cited by 2,155
Riggs, B. L., & Melton, L. J. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198606263142605 · Cited by 1,915
Baseline Measurement of Bone Mass Predicts Fracture in White Women
Hui, S. L., Slemenda, C. W., & Johnston, C. C. (1989) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-111-5-355 · Cited by 580
Self-citationLarsen, E. R., Mosekilde, L., & Foldspang, A. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.0301240 · Cited by 364
A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Vogel, J. M., & Wasnich, R. D. (1990) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02555036 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, D. M., Khairi, M. R., & Johnston, C. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1975-08-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-318
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965116818
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci108095
- The paper
- Smith, D. M., Khairi, M. R., & Johnston, C. C. (1975). The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci108095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.