The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manometry of the Normal Upper Esophageal Sphincter and its Alterations in Laryngectomy
Open accessAbstract
Rapid pull-through pressure profiles of the normal human upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were simultaneously studied with a conventional three-orifice Honeywell solid-state probe, an eight lumen radially perfused (RP) probe, and a circumferentially sensitive (CS) probe designed to measure UES pressure (UESP) without regard to probe orientation. Pressure curves were digitized and analyzed by computer. The Honeywell probe recorded significantly lower peak pressures than the other two methods, and had wide intrasubject pressure variations (average coefficient of variation, 53%). In contrast, UESP measured with the CS probe was constant for each subject (mean peak UESP, 121 mm Hg; average coefficient of variation, 15%). Anteroposterior RP probe UESP were identical to CS probe pressures. Thus, peak perfused anteroposterior UESP correlates with circumferentially measured sphincter squeeze.Computer programs were written that allowed RP probe pressures to be mapped in three dimensions. Normal three-dimensional maps were characterized by anteroposterior accentuation of peak pressures and also by consistent axial asymmetry with anterior peak pressures occurring 0.8+/-0.2 cm closer to the pharynx. After defining the normal two- and three-dimensional UESP configuration, patients who had undergone laryngectomy were studied. Peak pressures measured with the RP probe decreased to congruent with50 mm Hg and radial pressure asymmetry vanished. Like normals, CS probe pressures corresponded to peak RP probe pressures. UES length did not change significantly. Three-dimensional mapping showed that axial asymmetry also vanished. It therefore appears that the anatomic alterations produced by laryngectomy abolishes UESP asymmetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Timing of Major Events of Pharyngeal Swallowing
McConnel, F. M. S., Cerenko, D., Jackson, R. T., & Guffin, T. N. (1988) · Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.1988.01860240063025 · Cited by 107
The upper oesophageal sphincter
Singh, S., & Hamdy, S. (2005) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00662.x · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, R. W., Luckmann, K., Ricks, P. M., Drake, S. T., & Gates, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1979-05-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1036-1041
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140244228
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manometry of the Normal Upper Esophageal Sphincter and its Alterations in Laryngectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci109372
- The paper
- Welch, R. W., Luckmann, K., Ricks, P. M., Drake, S. T., & Gates, G. A. (1979). Manometry of the Normal Upper Esophageal Sphincter and its Alterations in Laryngectomy. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci109372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.