The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Acute Low Pressure Pulmonary Edema in Dogs
Open accessAbstract
Severe pulmonary edema sometimes develops despite normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (Ppw). The equation describing net transvascular flux of lung liquid predicts decreased edema when hydrostatic pressure is reduced or when colloid osmotic pressure is increased in the pulmonary vessels. We tested these predictions in a model of pulmonary capillary leak produced in 35 dogs by intravenous oleic acid. 1 h later, the dogs were divided into five equal groups and treated for 4 h in different ways: (a) not treated, to serve as the control group (Ppw = 11.1 mm Hg); (b) given albumin to increase colloid osmotic pressure by 5 mm Hg (Ppw = 10.6 mm Hg); (c) ventilated with 10 cm H(2)O positive end-expiratory pressure (Peep) (transmural Ppw = 10.4 mm Hg); (d) phlebotomized to reduce Ppw to 6 mm Hg; (e) infused with nitroprusside, which also reduced Ppw to 6 mm Hg. Phlebotomy and nitroprusside reduced the edema in excised lungs by 50% (P< 0.001), but Peep and albumin did not affect the edema. Pulmonary shunt decreased on Peep and increased on nitroprusside, and lung compliance was not different among the treatment groups, demonstrating that these variables are poor indicators of changes in edema. Cardiac output decreased during the treatment period in all but the nitroprusside group, where Ppw decreased and cardiac output did not. We conclude that canine oleic acid pulmonary edema is reduced by small reductions in hydrostatic pressure, but not by increased colloid osmotic pressure, because the vascular permeability to liquid and protein is increased. These results suggest that low pressure pulmonary edema may be reduced by seeking the lowest Ppw consistent with adequate cardiac output enhanced by vasoactive agents like nitroprusside. Further, colloid infusions and Peep are not helpful in reducing edema, so they may be used in the lowest amount that provides adequate circulating volume and arterial O(2) saturation on nontoxic inspired O(2). Until these therapeutic principles receive adequate clinical trial, they provide a rationale for carefully monitored cardiovascular manipulation in treating patients with pulmonary capillary leak.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Matthay, M. A. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605303342209 · Cited by 4,923
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Ware, L. B., & Matthay, M. A. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421806 · Cited by 4,666
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062200 · Cited by 3,538
The acute respiratory distress syndrome
Matthay, M. A., Ware, L. B., & Zimmerman, G. A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci60331 · Cited by 1,706
Hickling, K. G., Henderson, S. J., & Jackson, R. (1990) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01735174 · Cited by 933
Metadata
- Authors
- Prewitt, R. M., McCarthy, J., & Wood, L. D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1981-02-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 409-418
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123557342
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Acute Low Pressure Pulmonary Edema in Dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci110049
- The paper
- Prewitt, R. M., McCarthy, J., & Wood, L. D. H. (1981). Treatment of Acute Low Pressure Pulmonary Edema in Dogs. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci110049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.