The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relative ion permeability of normal and cystic fibrosis nasal epithelium.
Open accessAbstract
The raised transepithelial electric potential difference (PD) across respiratory epithelia in cystic fibrosis (CF) has suggested an abnormality in ion permeation. We characterized this abnormality further by measuring in the nasal epithelia of CF and normal subjects the concentration-PD relationship for amiloride, an inhibitor of cell Na+ permeability, and PD responses to superfusion with solutions of different composition. Amiloride was more efficacious in the CF subjects but the ED50 was not different from that of normals (approximately 2 X 10(-6) M). Na+ replacement by choline induced effects similar to those of amiloride, i.e. a greater depolarization in CF subjects. A 10-fold increase in the K+ concentration of the perfusate induced a small (less than 10 mV) depolarization in both subject populations. When Cl- in the perfusate was replaced by gluconate or SO2-(4) the nasal PD of normal subjects hyperpolarized (lumen became more negative) by approximately 35 mV. A significantly smaller response (less than 17 mV) was induced in CF homozygotes but not in heterozygotes (38 mV). The smaller response of CF subjects appears to reflect an absolute decrease in luminal surface Cl- permeability because pretreatment with amiloride did not increase the response to Cl- free solution (7 mV). Accordingly, three abnormalities (decreased Cl- permeability, raised PD, greater amiloride efficacy) have been identified in CF respiratory epithelia. Whereas "excessive" active Na+ transport can account for these abnormalities and the dessication of airway surface liquid, it is possible that a lower lumenal cell membrane Cl- permeability and inhibition of a potential path of Cl- secretion can also explain the observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Cloning and Characterization of Complementary DNA
Riordan, J. R., Rommens, J. M., Kerem, B.-S., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N., Chou, J.-L., et al. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2475911 · Cited by 7,418
Rowe, S. M., Miller, S., & Sorscher, E. J. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra043184 · Cited by 1,398
Highsmith, W. E., Burch, L. H., Zhou, Z., Olsen, J. C., Boat, T. E., Spock, A., Gorvoy, J. D., Quittell, L., Friedman, K. J., Silverman, L. M., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199410133311503 · Cited by 441
Self-citationPhysiological Basis of Cystic Fibrosis: A Historical Perspective
QUINTON, P. M. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.s3 · Cited by 405
Pulmonary epithelial sodium-channel dysfunction and excess airway liquid in pseudohypoaldosteronism
Kerem, E., Bistritzer, T., Hanukoglu, A., Hofmann, T., Zhou, Z., Bennett, W., MacLaughlin, E., Barker, P., Nash, M., Quittell, L., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907153410304 · Cited by 356
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knowles, M., Gatzy, J., & Boucher, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1983-05-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1410-1417
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144248619
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative ion permeability of normal and cystic fibrosis nasal epithelium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci110894
- The paper
- Knowles, M., Gatzy, J., & Boucher, R. (1983). Relative ion permeability of normal and cystic fibrosis nasal epithelium. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci110894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.