The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persistent allopeptide reactivity and epitope spreading in chronic rejection of organ allografts.
Open accessAbstract
The role of the indirect allorecognition pathway in acute allograft rejection has been documented both in organ recipients and in experimental models. However, it is unknown whether self-restricted recognition of donor alloantigens also contributes to chronic allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between allopeptide reactivity, epitope spreading, and chronic rejection. Using synthetic peptides corresponding to the hypervariable region of 32 HLA-DR alleles, we have followed the specificity of self-restricted T cell alloresponses to the donor in a population of 34 heart allograft recipients. T cells from sequential samples of blood collected from the patients up to 36 mo after transplantation were studied in limiting dilution analysis for allopeptide reactivity. The incidence of coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV) was significantly higher in patients who displayed persistent alloreactivity late after transplantation than in patients who showed no alloreactivity after the first 6 mo after transplantation. Both intra- and intermolecular spreading of epitopes was observed with an increased frequency in patients developing CAV in less than 2 yr, compared with patients without CAV; this suggests that diversification of the immune response against the graft contributes to chronic rejection. These data provide a strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing CAV and a rationale for therapeutic intervention aimed to prevent the progression of the rejection process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction
(2006) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21280 · Cited by 359
Mechanism of cellular rejection in transplantation
Ingulli, E. (2010) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-008-1020-x · Cited by 313
T cell Allorecognition Pathways in Solid Organ Transplantation
Siu, J. H. Y., Surendrakumar, V., Richards, J. A., & Pettigrew, G. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02548 · Cited by 223
Extracellular vesicles in allograft rejection and tolerance
Benichou, G., Wang, M., Ahrens, K., & Madsen, J. C. (2020) · Cellular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104063 · Cited by 67
Emerging role of exosomes in allorecognition and allograft rejection
Gonzalez-Nolasco, B., Wang, M., Prunevieille, A., & Benichou, G. (2018) · Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation · doi:10.1097/mot.0000000000000489 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciubotariu, R., Liu, Z., Colovai, A. I., Ho, E., Itescu, S., Ravalli, S., Hardy, M. A., Cortesini, R., Rose, E. A., & Suciu-Foca, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1998-01-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 398-405
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012447761
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistent allopeptide reactivity and epitope spreading in chronic rejection of organ allografts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci1117
- The paper
- Ciubotariu, R., Liu, Z., Colovai, A. I., Ho, E., Itescu, S., Ravalli, S., Hardy, M. A., Cortesini, R., Rose, E. A., & Suciu-Foca, N. (1998). Persistent allopeptide reactivity and epitope spreading in chronic rejection of organ allografts. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci1117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.