Cited by 31Cell Adhesion Molecules ResearchCongenital heart defects researchCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Myocardial localization and isoforms of neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) in the developing and transplanted human heart

Open access
Gordon, L, Wharton, J, Moore, S E, Walsh, F S, Moscoso, J G, Penketh, R, Wallwork, J, Taylor, K M +2 more·1990·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) has been implicated in cellular interactions involved in cardiac morphogenesis and innervation. Immunohistochemical techniques and Western blot analysis were used to determine the localization and isoforms of N-CAM in the developing and extrinsically denervated human heart. Myocardial and conducting cells in the fetal heart (7-24 wk gestation) exhibited sarcolemmal immunoreactivity, the major desialo N-CAM isoforms being 150, 145, 120, 115, and 110 kD. N-CAM expression appeared to be downregulated in the myocardium during adult life, with relatively little sarcolemmal immunoreactivity being detected in normal donor tissues. In contrast to the temporal changes observed in the myocardium, both the developing and mature cardiac innervation displayed N-CAM immunofluorescence staining, localized to neuronal cell bodies, nerve fascicles and fibres. Extrinsically denervated cardiac allografts, obtained 2 d to 91 mo after transplantation, showed extensive sarcolemmal and intercalated disc immunostaining and expression of 125-, 120-, and 115-kD isoforms. Tissues from explanted recipient hearts and atrial appendage samples obtained during coronary bypass graft operations were also examined and displayed varying amounts of N-CAM immunoreactivity. We conclude that the expression of N-CAM immunoreactivity and isoforms in the human heart is developmentally regulated and may be modulated by factors such as cardiac innervation and myocardial hypertrophy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci114837

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first quantified NCAM1 isoform is missing residues 354-363 compared to the canonical sequence and corresponds to isoform 2 on SwissProt (P13591-1), which corresponds to N-CAM 140 known to be expressed in developing hearts.

    “The first quantified isoform is missing residues 354–363 compared to the canonical sequence and, hence, corresponds to isoform 2 on SwissProt (P13591–1). This, in turn, corresponds to N-CAM 140 isoform in the biomedical literature that is known to be expressed in developing hearts (Gordon et al., 1990).”

    From Splice-Junction-Based Mapping of Alternative Isoforms in the Human Proteome (2019) · cites this paper as Gordon et al., 1990

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nybroe, 0., D. Linnemann, and E. Bock. 1988. N-CAM biosyn- thesis in brain. Neurochem. Int. 12:251-262.
  2. Covault, J., and J. R. Sanes. 1985. Neural cell adhesion mole- cule (N-CAM) accumulates in denervated and paralysed muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:4544-4548.

Authors
Gordon, L., Wharton, J., Moore, S. E., Walsh, F. S., Moscoso, J. G., Penketh, R., Wallwork, J., Taylor, K. M., Yacoub, M. H., & Polak, J. M.
Affiliations
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • Harefield Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Papworth Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1990-10-01
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
1293-1300
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010740233
Cited by
31
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
CD56, myocardium, cardiac innervation, heart development, cardiac allograft, extrinsic denervation, sarcolemma, intercalated discs, cardiac morphogenesis, cardiac hypertrophy, atrial appendage, fetal heart, coronary artery bypass grafting
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Female, Fetal Heart, Heart, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Myocardium, Pregnancy, Transplantation, Homologous, Immunoblotting, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal, Heart Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review