The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synthetic amphipathic helical peptides that mimic apolipoprotein A-I in clearing cellular cholesterol.
Open accessAbstract
Clearance of excess cholesterol from cells by HDL is facilitated by the interaction of HDL apolipoproteins with cell-surface binding sites or receptors, a process that may be important in preventing atherosclerosis. In this study, synthetic peptides containing 18-mer amphipathic helices of the class found in HDL apolipoproteins (class A) were tested for their abilities to remove cholesterol and phospholipid from cultured sterol-laden fibroblasts and macrophages and to interact with cell-surface HDL binding sites. Lipid-free peptides containing two identical tandem repeats of class A amphipathic helices promoted cholesterol and phospholipid efflux from cells and depleted cellular cholesterol accessible for esterification by acyl CoA/cholesterol acyltransferase, similar to what was observed for purified apolipoprotein A-I. Peptide-mediated removal of plasma membrane cholesterol and depletion of acyl CoA/cholesterol acyltransferase-accessible cholesterol appeared to occur by separate mechanisms, as the latter process was less dependent on extracellular phospholipid. The dimeric amphipathic helical peptides also competed for high-affinity HDL binding sites on cholesterol-loaded fibroblasts and displayed saturable high-affinity binding to the cell surface. In contrast, peptides with a single helix had little or no ability to remove cellular cholesterol and phospholipid, or to interact with HDL binding sites, suggesting that cooperativity between two or more helical repeats is required for these activities. Thus, synthetic peptides comprising dimers of a structural motif common to exchangeable apolipoproteins can mimic apolipoprotein A-I in both binding to putative cell-surface receptors and clearing cholesterol from cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oram, J. F., & Heinecke, J. W. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2005 · Cited by 521
Self-citationImportance of Different Pathways of Cellular Cholesterol Efflux
Yancey, P. G., Bortnick, A. E., Kellner-Weibel, G., de la Llera-Moya, M., Phillips, M. C., & Rothblat, G. H. (2003) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.0000057572.97137.dd · Cited by 507
Cell cholesterol efflux: integration of old and new observations provides new insights
Rothblat, G. H., de la Llera-Moya, M., Atger, V., Kellner-Weibel, G., Williams, D. L., & Phillips, M. C. (1999) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)32113-1 · Cited by 503
Bergt, C., Pennathur, S., Fu, X., Byun, J., O'Brien, K., McDonald, T. O., Singh, P., Anantharamaiah, G. M., Chait, A., Brunzell, J., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405292101 · Cited by 454
Self-citationATP-Binding Cassette Cholesterol Transporters and Cardiovascular Disease
Oram, J. F., & Vaughan, A. M. (2006) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000250171.54048.5c · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendez, A. J., Anantharamaiah, G. M., Segrest, J. P., & Oram, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1698-1705
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990585451
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic amphipathic helical peptides that mimic apolipoprotein A-I in clearing cellular cholesterol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci117515
- The paper
- Mendez, A. J., Anantharamaiah, G. M., Segrest, J. P., & Oram, J. F. (1994). Synthetic amphipathic helical peptides that mimic apolipoprotein A-I in clearing cellular cholesterol. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci117515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.