Cited by 149Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Kidney-infiltrating T cells in murine lupus nephritis are metabolically and functionally exhausted

Open access
Tilstra, Jeremy S., Avery, Lyndsay, Menk, Ashley V., Gordon, Rachael A., Smita, Shuchi, Kane, Lawrence P., Chikina, Maria, Delgoffe, Greg M. +1 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

While T cells are important for the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis, little is known about how T cells function after infiltrating the kidney. The current paradigm suggests that kidney-infiltrating T cells (KITs) are activated effector cells contributing to tissue damage and ultimately organ failure. Herein, we demonstrate that the majority of CD4+ and CD8+ KITs in 3 murine lupus models are not effector cells, as hypothesized, but rather express multiple inhibitory receptors and are highly dysfunctional, with reduced cytokine production and proliferative capacity. In other systems, this hypofunctional profile is linked directly to metabolic and specifically mitochondrial dysfunction, which we also observed in KITs. The T cell phenotype was driven by the expression of an "exhausted" transcriptional signature. Our data thus reveal that the tissue parenchyma has the capability of suppressing T cell responses and limiting damage to self. These findings suggest avenues for the treatment of autoimmunity based on selectively exploiting the exhausted phenotype of tissue-infiltrating T cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci120859

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 149

Authors
Tilstra, J. S., Avery, L., Menk, A. V., Gordon, R. A., Smita, S., Kane, L. P., Chikina, M., Delgoffe, G. M., & Shlomchik, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Shlomchik, Mark J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2018-09-24
Volume
128
Issue
11
Pages
4884-4897
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2888344630
Cited by
149
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH (AR044077, R01 AI137132)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
lupus nephritis, T cell exhaustion, systemic lupus erythematosus, inhibitory receptors, mitochondrial dysfunction, T cell metabolism, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, autoimmunity, murine lupus model
MeSH terms
Animals, Kidney, Lupus Nephritis, Mice, Inbred BALB C, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Autoimmunity, Mice, Knockout, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Mice, Inbred MRL lpr, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review