Cited by 132Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Sympathetic β1-adrenergic signaling contributes to regulation of human bone metabolism

Open access
Khosla, Sundeep, Drake, Matthew T., Volkman, Tammie L., Thicke, Brianne S., Achenbach, Sara J., Atkinson, Elizabeth J., Joyner, Michael J., Rosen, Clifford J. +2 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence from rodent studies indicates that the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) regulates bone metabolism, principally via β2-adrenergic receptors (β2-ARs). Given the conflicting human data, we used multiple approaches to evaluate the role of the SNS in regulating human bone metabolism. METHODS: Bone biopsies were obtained from 19 young and 19 elderly women for assessment of ADRB1, ADRB2, and ADRB3 mRNA expression. We examined the relationship of β-blocker use to bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT in a population sample of 248 subjects. A total of 155 postmenopausal women were randomized to 1 of 5 treatment groups for 20 weeks: placebo; propranolol, 20 mg b.i.d.; propranolol, 40 mg b.i.d.; atenolol, 50 mg/day; or nebivolol, 5 mg/day. We took advantage of the β1-AR selectivity gradient of these drugs (propranolol [nonselective] << atenolol [relatively β1-AR selective] < nebivolol [highly β1-AR selective]) to define the β-AR selectivity for SNS effects on bone. RESULTS: ADRB1 and ADRB2, but not ADRB3, were expressed in human bone; patients treated clinically with β1-AR-selective blockers had better bone microarchitecture than did nonusers, and relative to placebo, atenolol and nebivolol, but not propranolol, reduced the bone resorption marker serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (by 19.5% and 20.6%, respectively; P < 0.01) and increased bone mineral density of the ultradistal radius (by 3.6% and 2.9%; P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These 3 independent lines of evidence strongly support a role for adrenergic signaling in the regulation of bone metabolism in humans, principally via β1-ARs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02467400. FUNDING: This research was supported by the NIH (AG004875 and AR027065) and a Mayo Clinic Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) (UL1 TR002377).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci122151

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an earlier identically designed beta-blocker RCT, β1-selective blockers lowered bone resorption and raised radius BMD, but not central-site BMD, likely because DXA at the radius is more precise.

    “We observed similar findings in a previous, identically designed RCT of beta-blockers where relatively β1-selective blockers reduced bone resorption and increased BMD at the radius, but not central sites, presumably because of the greater precision for the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the radius29.”

    From Effects of intermittent senolytic therapy on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The paper reports that atenolol and nebivolol reduced the bone-resorption marker CTx, and its Discussion (page unavailable) reports significant BMD gains at the ultradistal radius but no significant changes at the femur neck or spine. Our copy does not attribute the difference between sites to greater precision of radius DXA measurements, so that proposed explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • P1NP and CTx in serum were quantified using validated standard assays.

    “As we have established29,39,40, serum P1NP and CTx were measured with standard, validated assays: P1NP by radioimmunoassay (Orion Diagnostica, coefficient of variation <9%); and CTx by one-step ELISA (Nordic Bioscience Diagnostics, coefficient of variation <8%).”
  • A licensed X-ray technician with long experience performed the DXA scans, and phantom scans checked for drift.

    “DXA scans of the lumbar spine (L1–L4), hip (femoral neck) and radius were obtained at baseline and 20 weeks (study endpoint) using the Lunar iDXA (GE Medical Systems; Encore software v.12.2) in the Mayo Clinic CRTU by a licensed X-ray technician with long-term experience29,39,40. Phantoms were scanned to detect potential drift and results were appended to a quality control database.”

    From Effects of intermittent senolytic therapy on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The methods passage (section labeled “Cell culture studies”; page unavailable) reports DXA measurements at baseline and 20 weeks, but does not identify who performed the scans. Searches for a licensed or experienced technician and for phantom scans or drift checks found no passage addressing those details. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 132

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]40. Baker JG. The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor ago- nists at human beta1-, beta2-and beta3-adreno- ceptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160(5):1048-1061.

Authors
Khosla, S., Drake, M. T., Volkman, T. L., Thicke, B. S., Achenbach, S. J., Atkinson, E. J., Joyner, M. J., Rosen, C. J., Monroe, D. G., & Farr, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Maine Medical Center Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Khosla, Sundeep
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
128
Issue
11
Pages
4832-4842
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2889322815
Cited by
132
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG004875)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR027065)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR002377)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
sympathetic nervous system, beta1-adrenergic receptor, beta2-adrenergic receptor, beta3-adrenergic receptor, bone metabolism, bone microarchitecture, beta-blockers, propranolol, atenolol, nebivolol, bone resorption, C-terminal telopeptide, bone mineral density, postmenopausal women, ADRB1, ADRB2
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Bone and Bones, Bone Resorption, Cell Line, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Peptides, Sympathetic Nervous System, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-3, Collagen Type I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review