Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collecting duct–specific gene inactivation of αENaC in the mouse kidney does not impair sodium and potassium balance

Open access
Rubera, Isabelle, Loffing, Johannes, Palmer, Lawrence G., Frindt, Gustavo, Fowler-Jaeger, Nicole, Sauter, Daniel, Carroll, Tom, McMahon, Andrew, Hummler, Edith, Rossier, Bernard C.·2003·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Aldosterone controls the final sodium reabsorption and potassium secretion in the kidney by regulating the activity of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron (ASDN). ASDN consists of the last portion of the distal convoluted tubule (late DCT), the connecting tubule (CNT), and the collecting duct (CD) (i.e., the cortical CD [CCD] and the medullary CD [MCD]). It has been proposed that the control of sodium transport in the CCD is essential for achieving sodium and potassium balance. We have tested this hypothesis by inactivating the alpha subunit of ENaC in the CD but leaving ENaC expression in the late DCT and CNT intact. Under salt restriction or under aldosterone infusion, whole-cell voltage clamp of principal cells of CCD showed no detectable ENaC activity, whereas large amiloride-sensitive currents were observed in control littermates. The animals survive well and are able to maintain sodium and potassium balance, even when challenged by salt restriction, water deprivation, or potassium loading. We conclude that the expression of ENaC in the CD is not a prerequisite for achieving sodium and potassium balance in mice. This stresses the importance of more proximal nephron segments (late DCT/CNT) to achieve sodium and potassium balance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci16956

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Rubera, I., Loffing, J., Palmer, L. G., Frindt, G., Fowler-Jaeger, N., Sauter, D., Carroll, T., McMahon, A., Hummler, E., & Rossier, B. C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2003-08-15
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
554-565
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130632820
Cited by
210
References
1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collecting duct–specific gene inactivation of αENaC in the mouse kidney does not impair sodium and potassium balance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci16956
The paper
Rubera, I., Loffing, J., Palmer, L. G., Frindt, G., Fowler-Jaeger, N., Sauter, D., Carroll, T., McMahon, A., Hummler, E., & Rossier, B. C. (2003). Collecting duct–specific gene inactivation of αENaC in the mouse kidney does not impair sodium and potassium balance. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci16956

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.