The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical and metabolic correction of pompe disease by enzyme therapy in acid maltase-deficient quail.
Open accessAbstract
Pompe disease is a fatal genetic muscle disorder caused by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA), a glycogen degrading lysosomal enzyme. GAA-deficient (AMD) Japanese quails exhibit progressive myopathy and cannot lift their wings, fly, or right themselves from the supine position (flip test). Six 4-wk-old acid maltase-deficient quails, with the clinical symptoms listed, were intravenously injected with 14 or 4.2 mg/kg of precursor form of recombinant human GAA or buffer alone every 2-3 d for 18 d (seven injections). On day 18, both high dose-treated birds (14 mg/kg) scored positive flip tests and flapped their wings, and one bird flew up more than 100 cm. GAA activity increased in most of the tissues examined. In heart and liver, glycogen levels dropped to normal and histopathology was normal. In pectoralis muscle, morphology was essentially normal, except for increased glycogen granules. In sharp contrast, sham-treated quail muscle had markedly increased glycogen granules, multi-vesicular autophagosomes, and inter- and intrafascicular fatty infiltrations. Low dose-treated birds (4.2 mg/kg) improved less biochemically and histopathologically than high dose birds, indicating a dose-dependent response. Additional experiment with intermediate doses and extended treatment (four birds, 5.7-9 mg/kg for 45 d) halted the progression of the disease. Our data is the first to show that an exogenous protein can target to muscle and produce muscle improvement. These data also suggest enzyme replacement with recombinant human GAA is a promising therapy for human Pompe disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enzyme-Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis I
Kakkis, E. D., Muenzer, J., Tiller, G. E., Waber, L., Belmont, J., Passage, M., Izykowski, B., Phillips, J., Doroshow, R., Walot, I., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101183440304 · Cited by 667
Raben, N., Nagaraju, K., Lee, E., Kessler, P., Byrne, B., Lee, L., LaMarca, M., King, C., Ward, J., Sauer, B., et al. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.30.19086 · Cited by 299
Kishnani, P. S., Nicolino, M., Voit, T., Rogers, R. C., Tsai, A. C.-H., Waterson, J., Herman, G. E., Amalfitano, A., Thurberg, B. L., Richards, S., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.02.035 · Cited by 282
Self-citationSmith, B. K., Collins, S. W., Conlon, T. J., Mah, C. S., Lawson, L. A., Martin, A. D., Fuller, D. D., Cleaver, B. D., Clément, N., Phillips, D., et al. (2013) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2012.250 · Cited by 158
Corti, M., Liberati, C., Smith, B. K., Lawson, L. A., Tuna, I. S., Conlon, T. J., Coleman, K. E., Islam, S., Herzog, R. W., Fuller, D. D., et al. (2017) · Human Gene Therapy Clinical Development · doi:10.1089/humc.2017.146 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Kikuchi, T., Yang, H. W., Pennybacker, M., Ichihara, N., Mizutani, M., Van Hove, J. L., & Chen, Y. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1998-02-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 827-833
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019247095
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and metabolic correction of pompe disease by enzyme therapy in acid maltase-deficient quail. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci1722
- The paper
- Kikuchi, T., Yang, H. W., Pennybacker, M., Ichihara, N., Mizutani, M., Van Hove, J. L., & Chen, Y. T. (1998). Clinical and metabolic correction of pompe disease by enzyme therapy in acid maltase-deficient quail. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci1722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.