Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiac adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery rescues failing myocardium

Open access
Most, Patrick, Pleger, Sven T., Völkers, Mirko, Heidt, Beatrix, Boerries, Melanie, Weichenhan, Dieter, Löffler, Eva, Janssen, Paul M.L., Eckhart, Andrea D., Martini, Jeffrey, Williams, Matthew L., Katus, Hugo A., Remppis, Andrew, Koch, Walter J.·2004·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Cardiac-restricted overexpression of the Ca2+-binding protein S100A1 has been shown to lead to increased myocardial contractile performance in vitro and in vivo. Since decreased cardiac expression of S100A1 is a characteristic of heart failure, we tested the hypothesis that S100A1 gene transfer could restore contractile function of failing myocardium. Adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery normalized S100A1 protein expression in a postinfarction rat heart failure model and reversed contractile dysfunction of failing myocardium in vivo and in vitro. S100A1 gene transfer to failing cardiomyocytes restored diminished intracellular Ca2+ transients and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ load mechanistically due to increased SR Ca2+ uptake and reduced SR Ca2+ leak. Moreover, S100A1 gene transfer decreased elevated intracellular Na+ concentrations to levels detected in nonfailing cardiomyocytes, reversed reactivated fetal gene expression, and restored energy supply in failing cardiomyocytes. Intracoronary adenovirus-mediated S100A1 gene delivery in vivo to the postinfarcted failing rat heart normalized myocardial contractile function and Ca2+ handling, which provided support in a physiological context for results found in myocytes. Thus, the present study demonstrates that restoration of S100A1 protein levels in failing myocardium by gene transfer may be a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of heart failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci200421454

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Most, P., Pleger, S. T., Völkers, M., Heidt, B., Boerries, M., Weichenhan, D., Löffler, E., Janssen, P. M. L., Eckhart, A. D., Martini, J., Williams, M. L., Katus, H. A., Remppis, A., & Koch, W. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
114
Issue
11
Pages
1550-1563
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167910093
Cited by
213
References
1
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery rescues failing myocardium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci200421454
The paper
Most, P., Pleger, S. T., Völkers, M., Heidt, B., Boerries, M., Weichenhan, D., Löffler, E., Janssen, P. M. L., Eckhart, A. D., Martini, J., Williams, M. L., Katus, H. A., Remppis, A., & Koch, W. J. (2004). Cardiac adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery rescues failing myocardium. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci200421454

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.