The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induction of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma by liver-specific disruption ofSmad4 andPten in mice
Open accessAbstract
Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CC), the second most common primary liver cancer, is associated with a poor prognosis. It has been shown that CCs harbor alterations of a number of tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes, yet key regulators for tumorigenesis remain unknown. Here we have generated a mouse model that develops CC with high penetrance using liver-specific targeted disruption of tumor suppressors SMAD4 and PTEN. In the absence of SMAD4 and PTEN, hyperplastic foci emerge exclusively from bile ducts of mutant mice at 2 months of age and continue to grow, leading to tumor formation in all animals at 4-7 months of age. We show that CC formation follows a multistep progression of histopathological changes that are associated with significant alterations, including increased levels of phosphorylated AKT, FOXO1, GSK-3beta, mTOR, and ERK and increased nuclear levels of cyclin D1. We further demonstrate that SMAD4 and PTEN regulate each other through a novel feedback mechanism to maintain an expression balance and synergistically repress CC formation. Finally, our analysis of human CC detected PTEN inactivation in a majority of p-AKT-positive CCs, while about half also lost SMAD4 expression. These findings elucidate the relationship between SMAD4 and PTEN and extend our understanding of CC formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glycogen synthase kinase-3β regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization
Diehl, J. A., Cheng, M., Roussel, M. F., & Sherr, C. J. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.22.3499 · Cited by 2,130
Stiles, B., Wang, Y., Stahl, A., Bassilian, S., Lee, W. P., Kim, Y.-J., Sherwin, R., Devaskar, S., Lesche, R., Magnuson, M. A., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308617100 · Cited by 436
Role of Smad4 (DPC4) inactivation in human cancer
Miyaki, M., & Kuroki, T. (2003) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01066-0 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma
Ilyas, S. I., & Gores, G. J. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013 · Cited by 1,307
Zhang, N., Bai, H., David, K. K., Dong, J., Zheng, Y., Cai, J., Giovannini, M., Liu, P., Anders, R. A., & Pan, D. (2010) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015 · Cited by 804
The role of TGF-β/SMAD4 signaling in cancer
Zhao, M., Mishra, L., & Deng, C.-X. (2018) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.23230 · Cited by 631
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Activation of Mammalian Primordial Follicles
Adhikari, D., & Liu, K. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0048 · Cited by 481
Fate tracing of mature hepatocytes in mouse liver homeostasis and regeneration
Malato, Y., Naqvi, S., Schürmann, N., Ng, R., Wang, B., Zape, J., Kay, M. A., Grimm, D., & Willenbring, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci59261 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2006-07-03
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1843-1852
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110999558
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma by liver-specific disruption ofSmad4 andPten in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci27282
- The paper
- Xu, X. (2006). Induction of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma by liver-specific disruption ofSmad4 andPten in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci27282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.