Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The pulmonary circulation of homozygous or heterozygous eNOS-null mice is hyperresponsive to mild hypoxia

Open access
Fagan, Karen A., Fouty, Brian W., Tyler, Robert C., Morris, Kenneth G., Hepler, Lisa K., Sato, Koichi, LeCras, Timothy D., Abman, Steven H., Weinberger, Howard D., Huang, Paul L., McMurtry, Ivan F., Rodman, David M.·1999·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Acute hypoxic vasoconstriction and development of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) are unique properties of the pulmonary circulation. The pulmonary endothelium produces vasoactive factors, including nitric oxide (NO), that modify these phenomena. We tested the hypothesis that NO produced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) modulates pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia using mice with targeted disruption of the eNOS gene (eNOS-/-). Marked PHTN was found in eNOS-/- mice raised in mild hypoxia when compared with either controls or eNOS-/- mice raised in conditions simulating sea level. We found an approximate twofold increase in partially and fully muscularized distal pulmonary arteries in eNOS-/- mice compared with controls. Consistent with vasoconstriction being the primary mechanism of PHTN, however, acute inhalation of 25 ppm NO resulted in normalization of RV pressure in eNOS-/- mice. In addition to studies of eNOS-/- mice, the dose-effect of eNOS was tested using heterozygous eNOS+/- mice. Although the lungs of eNOS+/- mice had 50% of normal eNOS protein, the response to hypoxia was indistinguishable from that of eNOS-/- mice. We conclude that eNOS-derived NO is an important modulator of the pulmonary vascular response to chronic hypoxia and that more than 50% of eNOS expression is required to maintain normal pulmonary vascular tone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci3862

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Fagan, K. A., Fouty, B. W., Tyler, R. C., Morris, K. G., Hepler, L. K., Sato, K., LeCras, T. D., Abman, S. H., Weinberger, H. D., Huang, P. L., McMurtry, I. F., & Rodman, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1999-01-15
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
291-299
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107821473
Cited by
309
References
22
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pulmonary circulation of homozygous or heterozygous eNOS-null mice is hyperresponsive to mild hypoxia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci3862
The paper
Fagan, K. A., Fouty, B. W., Tyler, R. C., Morris, K. G., Hepler, L. K., Sato, K., LeCras, T. D., Abman, S. H., Weinberger, H. D., Huang, P. L., McMurtry, I. F., & Rodman, D. M. (1999). The pulmonary circulation of homozygous or heterozygous eNOS-null mice is hyperresponsive to mild hypoxia. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci3862

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.