Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Host-response biomarkers for diagnosis of late-onset septicemia and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

Open access
Ng, Pak Cheung, Ang, Irene Ling, Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun, Li, Karen, Lam, Hugh Simon, Wong, Raymond Pui On, Chui, Kit Man, Cheung, Hon Ming, Ng, Eddy Wing Yin, Fok, Tai Fai, Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu, Lo, Yuk Ming Dennis, Poon, Terence Chuen Wai·2010·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Preterm infants are highly susceptible to life-threatening infections that are clinically difficult to detect, such as late-onset septicemia and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Here, we used a proteomic approach to identify biomarkers for diagnosis of these devastating conditions. In a case-control study comprising 77 sepsis/NEC and 77 nonsepsis cases (10 in each group being monitored longitudinally), plasma samples collected at clinical presentation were assessed in the biomarker discovery and independent validation phases. We validated the discovered biomarkers in a prospective cohort study with 104 consecutively suspected sepsis/NEC episodes. Proapolipoprotein CII (Pro-apoC2) and a des-arginine variant of serum amyloid A (SAA) were identified as the most promising biomarkers. The ApoSAA score computed from plasma apoC2 and SAA concentrations was effective in identifying sepsis/NEC cases in the case-control and cohort studies. Stratification of infants into different risk categories by the ApoSAA score enabled neonatologists to withhold treatment in 45% and enact early stoppage of antibiotics in 16% of nonsepsis infants. The negative predictive value of this antibiotic policy was 100%. The ApoSAA score could potentially allow early and accurate diagnosis of sepsis/NEC. Upon confirmation by further multicenter trials, the score would facilitate rational prescription of antibiotics and target infants who require urgent treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci40196

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Ng, P. C., Ang, I. L., Chiu, R. W. K., Li, K., Lam, H. S., Wong, R. P. O., Chui, K. M., Cheung, H. M., Ng, E. W. Y., Fok, T. F., Sung, J. J. Y., Lo, Y. M. D., & Poon, T. C. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2010-08-02
Volume
120
Issue
8
Pages
2989-3000
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171360274
Cited by
161
References
1
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host-response biomarkers for diagnosis of late-onset septicemia and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci40196
The paper
Ng, P. C., Ang, I. L., Chiu, R. W. K., Li, K., Lam, H. S., Wong, R. P. O., Chui, K. M., Cheung, H. M., Ng, E. W. Y., Fok, T. F., Sung, J. J. Y., Lo, Y. M. D., & Poon, T. C. W. (2010). Host-response biomarkers for diagnosis of late-onset septicemia and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci40196

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.