Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adult mouse epicardium modulates myocardial injury by secreting paracrine factors

Open access
Zhou, Bin, Honor, Leah B., He, Huamei, Ma, Qing, Oh, Jin-Hee, Butterfield, Catherine, Lin, Ruei-Zeng, Melero-Martin, Juan M., Dolmatova, Elena, Duffy, Heather S., Gise, Alexander von, Zhou, Pingzhu, Hu, Yong Wu, Wang, Gang, Zhang, Bing, Wang, Lianchun, Hall, Jennifer L., Moses, Marsha A., McGowan, Francis X., Pu, William T.·2011·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The epicardium makes essential cellular and paracrine contributions to the growth of the fetal myocardium and the formation of the coronary vasculature. However, whether the epicardium has similar roles postnatally in the normal and injured heart remains enigmatic. Here, we have investigated this question using genetic fate-mapping approaches in mice. In uninjured postnatal heart, epicardial cells were quiescent. Myocardial infarction increased epicardial cell proliferation and stimulated formation of epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs), which remained in a thickened layer on the surface of the heart. EPDCs did not adopt cardiomyocyte or coronary EC fates, but rather differentiated into mesenchymal cells expressing fibroblast and smooth muscle cell markers. In vitro and in vivo assays demonstrated that EPDCs secreted paracrine factors that strongly promoted angiogenesis. In a myocardial infarction model, EPDC-conditioned medium reduced infarct size and improved heart function. Our findings indicate that epicardium modulates the cardiac injury response by conditioning the subepicardial environment, potentially offering a new therapeutic strategy for cardiac protection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci45529

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, B., Honor, L. B., He, H., Ma, Q., Oh, J.-H., Butterfield, C., Lin, R.-Z., Melero-Martin, J. M., Dolmatova, E., Duffy, H. S., Gise, A. V., Zhou, P., Hu, Y. W., Wang, G., Zhang, B., Wang, L., Hall, J. L., Moses, M. A., McGowan, F. X., & Pu, W. T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2011-05-02
Volume
121
Issue
5
Pages
1894-1904
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132562087
Cited by
517
References
39
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adult mouse epicardium modulates myocardial injury by secreting paracrine factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci45529
The paper
Zhou, B., Honor, L. B., He, H., Ma, Q., Oh, J.-H., Butterfield, C., Lin, R.-Z., Melero-Martin, J. M., Dolmatova, E., Duffy, H. S., Gise, A. V., Zhou, P., Hu, Y. W., Wang, G., Zhang, B., Wang, L., Hall, J. L., Moses, M. A., McGowan, F. X., & Pu, W. T. (2011). Adult mouse epicardium modulates myocardial injury by secreting paracrine factors. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci45529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.