Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defective regulation of the epithelial Na+ channel by Nedd4 in Liddle's syndrome

Open access
Abriel, Hugues, Loffing, Johannes, Rebhun, John F., Pratt, J. Howard, Schild, Laurent, Horisberger, Jean-Daniel, Rotin, Daniela, Staub, Olivier·1999·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Liddle's syndrome is an inherited form of hypertension linked to mutations in the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC). ENaC is composed of three subunits (alpha, beta, gamma), each containing a COOH-terminal PY motif (xPPxY). Mutations causing Liddle's syndrome alter or delete the PY motifs of beta- or gamma-ENaC. We recently demonstrated that the ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4 binds these PY motifs and that ENaC is regulated by ubiquitination. Here, we investigate, using the Xenopus oocyte system, whether Nedd4 affects ENaC function. Overexpression of wild-type Nedd4, together with ENaC, inhibited channel activity, whereas a catalytically inactive Nedd4 stimulated it, likely by acting as a competitive antagonist to endogenous Nedd4. These effects were dependant on the PY motifs, because no Nedd4-mediated changes in channel activity were observed in ENaC lacking them. The effect of Nedd4 on ENaC missing only one PY motif (of beta-ENaC), as originally described in patients with Liddle's syndrome, was intermediate. Changes were due entirely to alterations in ENaC numbers at the plasma membrane, as determined by surface binding and immunofluorescence. Our results demonstrate that Nedd4 is a negative regulator of ENaC and suggest that the loss of Nedd4 binding sites in ENaC observed in Liddle's syndrome may explain the increase in channel number at the cell surface, increased Na+ reabsorption by the distal nephron, and hence the hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci5713

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Abriel, H., Loffing, J., Rebhun, J. F., Pratt, J. H., Schild, L., Horisberger, J.-D., Rotin, D., & Staub, O.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
667-673
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075263445
Cited by
362
References
1
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defective regulation of the epithelial Na+ channel by Nedd4 in Liddle's syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci5713
The paper
Abriel, H., Loffing, J., Rebhun, J. F., Pratt, J. H., Schild, L., Horisberger, J.-D., Rotin, D., & Staub, O. (1999). Defective regulation of the epithelial Na+ channel by Nedd4 in Liddle's syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci5713

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.