Cited by 135Genetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research

Polycystin-1 maturation requires polycystin-2 in a dose-dependent manner

Open access
Gainullin, Vladimir G., Hopp, Katharina, Ward, Christopher J., Hommerding, Cynthia J., Harris, Peter C.·2015·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a common inherited nephropathy responsible for 4%-10% of end-stage renal disease cases. Mutations in the genes encoding polycystin-1 (PC1, PKD1) or polycystin-2 (PC2, PKD2) cause ADPKD, and PKD1 mutations are associated with more severe renal disease. PC1 has been shown to form a complex with PC2, and the severity of PKD1-mediated disease is associated with the level of the mature PC1 glycoform. Here, we demonstrated that PC1 and PC2 first interact in the ER before PC1 cleavage at the GPS/GAIN site and determined that PC2 acts as an essential chaperone for PC1 maturation and surface localization. The chaperone function of PC2 was dependent on the presence of the distal coiled-coil domain and was disrupted by pathogenic missense mutations. In Pkd2-/- mice, complete loss of PC2 prevented PC1 maturation. In Pkd2 heterozygotes, the 50% PC2 reduction resulted in a nonequimolar reduction (20%-25%) of the mature PC1 glycoform. Interbreeding between various Pkd1 and Pkd2 models revealed that animals with reduced levels of functional PC1 and PC2 in the kidney exhibited severe, rapidly progressive disease, illustrating the importance of complexing of these proteins for function. Our results indicate that PC2 regulates PC1 maturation; therefore, mature PC1 levels are a determinant of disease severity in PKD2 as well as PKD1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci76972

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gainullin, V. G., Hopp, K., Ward, C. J., Hommerding, C. J., & Harris, P. C.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2015-01-09
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
607-620
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153847689
Cited by
135
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32dk007013-45)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32-DK007013, DK090728, R01DK080688, P30DK090728, R01DK058816)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Keywords
polycystin-1, polycystin-2, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, protein maturation, chaperone activity, glycosylation, endoplasmic reticulum, coiled-coil domain, protein complex formation, disease severity, missense mutations
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Severity of Illness Index, Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant, Mice, Knockout, Molecular Chaperones, Mutation, Missense, Multiprotein Complexes, TRPP Cation Channels, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review