Cited by 149Liver physiology and pathologyDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionLiver Diseases and Immunity

Lineage fate of ductular reactions in liver injury and carcinogenesis

Open access
Jörs, Simone, Jeliazkova, Petia, Ringelhan, Marc, Thalhammer, Julian, Dürl, Stephanie, Ferrer, Jorge, Sander, Maike, Heikenwalder, Mathias +3 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Ductular reactions (DRs) are observed in virtually all forms of human liver disease; however, the histogenesis and function of DRs in liver injury are not entirely understood. It is widely believed that DRs contain bipotential liver progenitor cells (LPCs) that serve as an emergency cell pool to regenerate both cholangiocytes and hepatocytes and may eventually give rise to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we used a murine model that allows highly efficient and specific lineage labeling of the biliary compartment to analyze the histogenesis of DRs and their potential contribution to liver regeneration and carcinogenesis. In multiple experimental and genetic liver injury models, biliary cells were the predominant precursors of DRs but lacked substantial capacity to produce new hepatocytes, even when liver injuries were prolonged up to 12 months. Genetic modulation of NOTCH and/or WNT/β-catenin signaling within lineage-tagged DRs impaired DR expansion but failed to redirect DRs from biliary differentiation toward the hepatocyte lineage. Further, lineage-labeled DRs did not produce tumors in genetic and chemical HCC mouse models. In summary, we found no evidence in our system to support mouse biliary-derived DRs as an LPC pool to replenish hepatocytes in a quantitatively relevant way in injury or evidence that DRs give rise to HCCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci78585

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have demonstrated that HPCs arise within the liver, engraft the parenchyma, and may have some differentiation capacity but did not regenerate significant quantities of liver parenchyma.

    “These studies demonstrated that HPCs arise within the liver, engraft the parenchyma14 and may have some differentiation capacity but did not regenerate significant quantities of liver parenchyma11-13.”
  • Using the Krt19CreERTLSLTdTomato lineage tracing model, the degree of hepatocyte formation from ductular cells in the CDE diet and recovery model is limited.

    “Using the the Krt19CreERTLSLTdTomato lineage tracing model we found the degree of hepatocyte formation from ductular cells in the CDE diet and recovery model is limited13, 21, 45;”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 149

Authors
Jörs, S., Jeliazkova, P., Ringelhan, M., Thalhammer, J., Dürl, S., Ferrer, J., Sander, M., Heikenwalder, M., Schmid, R. M., Siveke, J. T., & Geisler, F.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Jörs, Simone
  • Jeliazkova, Petia
  • Geisler, Fabian
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
125
Issue
6
Pages
2445-2457
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020627106
Cited by
149
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung
  • Wellcome Trust (101033, 101033/C/13/Z)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GE 2289/1)
  • Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK078803, R01DK078803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
ductular reaction, liver injury, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver progenitor cells, hepatocyte regeneration, cholangiocytes, lineage tracing, Notch signaling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, hepatocarcinogenesis, histogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Bile Ducts, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver, Liver Neoplasms, Experimental, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Stem Cells, Hepatocytes, Mice, Wnt Signaling Pathway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review