Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predominant role for C5b-9 in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury

Open access
Zhou, Wuding, Farrar, Conrad A., Abe, Katsushige, Pratt, Julian R., Marsh, James E., Wang, Yi, Stahl, Gregory L., Sacks, Steven H.·2000·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Previous work has indicated that complement is a mediator of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. To investigate the components of complement responsible for this effect, we examined a model of renal I/R injury in C3-, C4-, C5-, and C6-deficient mice. We occluded the renal arteries and veins (40-58 minutes) and, after reperfusion (0-72 hours), assessed renal structural and functional injury. C3-, C5-, and C6-deficient mice were protected from renal I/R injury, whereas C4-deficient mice were not protected. C6-deficient mice treated with antibody to block C5a generation showed no additional protection from I/R injury. Reconstitution with C6 alone restored the I/R injury in C6-deficient mice. Tubular epithelial cells were the main structures damaged by complement-mediated attack, and, in contrast, the renal vessels were spared. Neutrophil infiltration and myeloperoxidase activity were reduced in C-deficient mouse kidney, but by a similar extent in C3-deficient and C6-deficient mice. We conclude that the membrane attack complex of complement (in which C5 and C6 participate) may account for the effect of complement on mouse renal I/R injury. Neither C5a-mediated neutrophil infiltration nor the classic pathway, in which C4 participates, appears to contribute to I/R injury in this model. By contrast with other organs, such as the heart, the primary effect of complement in the ischemic area is on the parenchymal cell rather than the vascular endothelial cell. The membrane attack complex of complement is a potential target for prevention of I/R injury in this model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci8621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, W., Farrar, C. A., Abe, K., Pratt, J. R., Marsh, J. E., Wang, Y., Stahl, G. L., & Sacks, S. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2000-05-15
Volume
105
Issue
10
Pages
1363-1371
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122918206
Cited by
465
References
1
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predominant role for C5b-9 in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci8621
The paper
Zhou, W., Farrar, C. A., Abe, K., Pratt, J. R., Marsh, J. E., Wang, Y., Stahl, G. L., & Sacks, S. H. (2000). Predominant role for C5b-9 in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci8621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.