The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of the Zonal Mean Atmospheric Circulation to El Niño versus Global Warming
Open accessAbstract
The change in the zonal mean atmospheric circulation under global warming is studied in comparison with the response to El Niño forcing, by examining the model simulations conducted for the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In contrast to the strengthening and contraction of the Hadley cell and the equatorward shift of the tropospheric zonal jets in response to El Niño, the Hadley cell weakens and expands poleward, and the jets move poleward in a warmed climate, despite the projected “El Niño–like” enhanced warming over the equatorial central and eastern Pacific. The hydrological impacts of global warming also exhibit distinct patterns over the subtropics and midlatitudes in comparison to the El Niño. Two feasible mechanisms are proposed for the zonal mean circulation response to global warming: 1) The increase in static stability of the subtropical and midlatitude troposphere, a robust result of the quasi-moist adiabatic adjustment to the surface warming, may stabilize the baroclinic eddy growth on the equatorward side of the storm tracks and push the eddy activity and the associated eddy-driven wind and subsidence poleward, leading to the poleward expansion of the Hadley cell and the shift of midlatitude jets; 2) the strengthening of the midlatitude wind at the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, arguably a consequence of increases in the meridional temperature gradient near the tropopause level due to the tropospheric warming and tropopause slope, may increase the eastward propagation of the eddies emanating from the midlatitudes, and thus the subtropical region of wave breaking displaces poleward together with the eddy-driven circulation. Both mechanisms are somewhat, if not completely, distinct from those in response to the El Niño condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming
Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., & Reichler, T. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl028443 · Cited by 1,219
Self-citation
Cited by
Seager, R., Naik, N., & Vecchi, G. A. (2010) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2010jcli3655.1 · Cited by 925
Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change
O’Gorman, P. A. (2012) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1568 · Cited by 349
Identifying external influences on global precipitation
Marvel, K., & Bonfils, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314382110 · Cited by 273
The expanding tropics: a critical assessment of the observational and modeling studies
Lucas, C., Timbal, B., & Nguyen, H. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.251 · Cited by 258
A robust increase in the eddy length scale in the simulation of future climates
Kidston, J., Dean, S. M., Renwick, J. A., & Vallis, G. K. (2010) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2009gl041615 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, J., Chen, G., & Frierson, D. M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2008-11-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5835-5851
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2117934260
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.