Permanent Meanders in the California Current System
Abstract
Surface Velocity Program (SVP) drifter data from 1987 through 2005; Archiving, Validation, and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic data (AVISO) sea level anomalies; and NCEP reanalysis winds are used to assemble a time-averaged map of the 15-m-deep geostrophic velocity field in the California Current System seaward of about 50 km from the coast. The wind data are used to compute the Ekman currents, which are then subtracted from the drifter velocity measurements. The resulting proxy for geostrophic velocity anomalies computed from drifters and from satellite sea level measurements are combined to form an unbiased mean geostrophic circulation map. The result shows a California Current System that flows southward with four permanent meanders that can extend seaward for more than 800 km. Bands of alternating eastward and westward zonal currents are connected to the meanders and extend several thousand kilometers into the Pacific Ocean. This observed time-mean circulation and its associated eddy energy are compared to those produced by various high-resolution OGCM solutions: Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS; 5 km), Parallel Ocean Program model (POP; 1/10°), Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM; 1/12°), and Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Layered Ocean Model (NLOM; 1/32°). Simulations in closest agreement with observations come from ROMS, which also produces four meanders, geostrophic time-mean currents, and geostrophic eddy energy consistent with the observed values. Th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eddy fluxes may also have an appreciable time-averaged effect on tracer advection in sectors of the California Current System where standing meanders yield intensified mesoscale and submesoscale activity.
“Eddy fluxes may also have an appreciable timeaveraged effect on tracer advection in sectors of the California Current System where standing meanders yield intensified mesoscale and submesoscale activity (Centurioni et al. 2008;Colas et al. 2013).”
From Competition between Baroclinic Instability and Ekman Transport under Varying Buoyancy Forcings in Upwelling Systems: An Idealized Analog to the Southern Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Centurioni et al. 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Centurioni, L. R., Ohlmann, J. C., & Niiler, P. P.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Oceanography
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1690-1710
- ISSN
- 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0485
- OpenAlex
- W2096610595
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
- Keywords
- California Current System, geostrophic circulation, eddy energy, Ekman currents, ocean eddies, ROMS, zonal flows, sea level anomalies, wind-driven currents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review