Cited by 103Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Permanent Meanders in the California Current System

Centurioni, L. R., Ohlmann, J. C., Niiler, P. P.·2008·Journal of Physical Oceanography

Abstract

Surface Velocity Program (SVP) drifter data from 1987 through 2005; Archiving, Validation, and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic data (AVISO) sea level anomalies; and NCEP reanalysis winds are used to assemble a time-averaged map of the 15-m-deep geostrophic velocity field in the California Current System seaward of about 50 km from the coast. The wind data are used to compute the Ekman currents, which are then subtracted from the drifter velocity measurements. The resulting proxy for geostrophic velocity anomalies computed from drifters and from satellite sea level measurements are combined to form an unbiased mean geostrophic circulation map. The result shows a California Current System that flows southward with four permanent meanders that can extend seaward for more than 800 km. Bands of alternating eastward and westward zonal currents are connected to the meanders and extend several thousand kilometers into the Pacific Ocean. This observed time-mean circulation and its associated eddy energy are compared to those produced by various high-resolution OGCM solutions: Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS; 5 km), Parallel Ocean Program model (POP; 1/10°), Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM; 1/12°), and Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Layered Ocean Model (NLOM; 1/32°). Simulations in closest agreement with observations come from ROMS, which also produces four meanders, geostrophic time-mean currents, and geostrophic eddy energy consistent with the observed values. Th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2008jpo3746.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 103

Authors
Centurioni, L. R., Ohlmann, J. C., & Niiler, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1690-1710
ISSN
  • 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0485
OpenAlex
W2096610595
Cited by
103
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Keywords
California Current System, geostrophic circulation, eddy energy, Ekman currents, ocean eddies, ROMS, zonal flows, sea level anomalies, wind-driven currents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review