Observations of the Transition Layer
Abstract
The transition layer is the poorly understood interface between the stratified, weakly turbulent interior and the strongly turbulent surface mixed layer. The transition layer displays elevated thermohaline variance compared to the interior and maxima in current shear, vertical stratification, and potential vorticity. A database of 91 916 km or 25 426 vertical profiles of temperature and salinity from SeaSoar, a towed vehicle, is used to define the transition layer thickness. Acoustic Doppler current measurements are also used, when available. Statistics of the transition layer thickness are compared for 232 straight SeaSoar sections, which range in length from 65 to 1129 km with typical horizontal resolution of ∼4 km and vertical resolution of 8 m. Transition layer thicknesses are calculated in three groups from 1) vertical displacements of the mixed layer base and of interior isopycnals into the mixed layer; 2) the depths below the mixed layer depth of peaks in shear, stratification, and potential vorticity and their widths; and 3) the depths below or above the mixed layer depth of extrema in thermohaline variance, density ratio, and isopycnal slope. From each SeaSoar section, the authors compile either a single value or a median value for each of the above measures. Each definition yields a median transition layer thickness from 8 to 24 m below the mixed layer depth. The only exception is the median depth of the maximum isopycnal slope, which is 37 m above the mixed layer b…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A transition layer with relatively elevated mixing levels is found below the mixed layer.
“Although our simulations do not resolve all relevant processes, a transition layer with relatively elevated mixing levels is found below the mixed layer (Large et al. 1994;Johnston and Rudnick 2009).”
From Competition between Baroclinic Instability and Ekman Transport under Varying Buoyancy Forcings in Upwelling Systems: An Idealized Analog to the Southern Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Johnston and Rudnick 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Johnston, T. M. S., & Rudnick, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Oceanography
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 780-797
- ISSN
- 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0485
- OpenAlex
- W1989731792
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- transition layer, mixed layer, transition layer thickness, potential vorticity, isopycnal slope, vertical shear, density ratio, momentum flux, buoyancy flux, submesoscale processes, SeaSoar, ocean stratification, isopycnal displacement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review