Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Maximum Intensity of Tropical Cyclones in Axisymmetric Numerical Model Simulations

Open access
Bryan, George H., Rotunno, Richard·2009·Monthly Weather Review

Abstract

An axisymmetric numerical model is used to evaluate the maximum possible intensity of tropical cyclones. As compared with traditionally formulated nonhydrostatic models, this new model has improved mass and energy conservation in saturated conditions. In comparison with the axisymmetric model developed by Rotunno and Emanuel, the new model produces weaker cyclones (by ∼10%, in terms of maximum azimuthal velocity); the difference is attributable to several approximations in the Rotunno–Emanuel model. Then, using a single specification for initial conditions (with a sea surface temperature of 26°C), the authors conduct model sensitivity tests to determine the sensitivity of maximum azimuthal velocity (υmax) to uncertain aspects of the modeling system. For fixed mixing lengths in the turbulence parameterization, a converged value of υmax is achieved for radial grid spacing of order 1 km and vertical grid spacing of order 250 m. The fall velocity of condensate (Vt) changes υmax by up to 60%, and the largest υmax occurs for pseudoadiabatic thermodynamics (i.e., for Vt > 10 m s−1). The sensitivity of υmax to the ratio of surface exchange coefficients for entropy and momentum (CE/CD) matches the theoretical result, υmax ∼ (CE/CD)1/2, for nearly inviscid flow, but simulations with increasing turbulence intensity show less dependence on CE/CD; this result suggests that the effect of CE/CD is less important than has been argued previously. The authors find that υmax is most sensitive to the intensity of turbulence in the radial direction. However, some settings, such as inviscid flow, yield clearly unnatural structures; for example, υmax exceeds 110 m s−1, despite a maximum observed intensity of ∼70 m s−1 for this environment. The authors show that turbulence in the radial direction limits maximum axisymmetric intensity by weakening the radial gradients of angular momentum (which prevents environmental air from being drawn to small radius) and of entropy (which is consistent with weaker intensity by consideration of thermal wind balance). It is also argued that future studies should consider parameterized turbulence as an important factor in simulated tropical cyclone intensity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2008mwr2709.1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Bryan, G. H., & Rotunno, R.
Venue
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
137
Issue
6
Pages
1770-1789
ISSN
  • 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0493
OpenAlex
W2047997348
Cited by
318
References
22
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Maximum Intensity of Tropical Cyclones in Axisymmetric Numerical Model Simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/2008mwr2709.1
The paper
Bryan, G. H., & Rotunno, R. (2009). The Maximum Intensity of Tropical Cyclones in Axisymmetric Numerical Model Simulations. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008mwr2709.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.