The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aircraft-Induced Hole Punch and Canal Clouds: Inadvertent Cloud Seeding
Open accessAbstract
The production of holes and channels in altocumulus clouds by two commercial turboprop aircraft is documented for the first time. An unprecedented dataset combining in situ measurements from microphysical probes with remote sensing measurements from cloud radar and lidar operating from the National Science Foundation (NSF)/NCAR C-130 aircraft, as well as ground-based NOAA and Colorado State University (CSU) radars, is used to describe the radar/lidar properties of a hole punch cloud and channel and the ensuing ice microphysical properties and structure of the ice column that subsequently developed. Ice particle production by commercial turboprop aircraft climbing through clouds much warmer than the regions where contrails are produced has the potential to significantly modify the cloud microphysical properties and effectively seed them under some conditions. Jet aircraft may also be producing hole punch clouds when flying through altocumulus with supercooled droplets at heights lower than their normal cruise altitudes, where contrails can form. Commercial aircraft can therefore generate ice and affect the clouds at temperatures as much as 30°C warmer than the −40°C contrail formation threshold temperature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aircraft-induced dissipation trails provide observational analogs for CCT/MCT techniques.
“Aircraft-induced dissipation trails (distrails), where localized particle injections cause cloud gaps through ice-crystal sedimentation, provide observational analogs for CCT/MCT techniques”
From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Heymsfield et al., 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hernandez‐Galindo, I., Määttänen, A., Redmond Roche, B. H., Boucher, O., Irvine, P. J., & Moore, J. C. (2026) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2025ef007254 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Heymsfield, A. J., Kennedy, P. C., Massie, S., Schmitt, C., Wang, Z., Haimov, S., & Rangno, A.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 753-766
- ISSN
- 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0477
- OpenAlex
- W2171461915
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0735110)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- altocumulus clouds, ice microphysics, supercooled water droplets, contrail formation, cloud seeding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review