Cited by 35Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aircraft-Induced Hole Punch and Canal Clouds: Inadvertent Cloud Seeding

Open access
Heymsfield, Andrew J., Kennedy, Patrick C., Massie, Steve, Schmitt, Carl, Wang, Zhien, Haimov, Samuel, Rangno, Art·2010·Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Abstract

The production of holes and channels in altocumulus clouds by two commercial turboprop aircraft is documented for the first time. An unprecedented dataset combining in situ measurements from microphysical probes with remote sensing measurements from cloud radar and lidar operating from the National Science Foundation (NSF)/NCAR C-130 aircraft, as well as ground-based NOAA and Colorado State University (CSU) radars, is used to describe the radar/lidar properties of a hole punch cloud and channel and the ensuing ice microphysical properties and structure of the ice column that subsequently developed. Ice particle production by commercial turboprop aircraft climbing through clouds much warmer than the regions where contrails are produced has the potential to significantly modify the cloud microphysical properties and effectively seed them under some conditions. Jet aircraft may also be producing hole punch clouds when flying through altocumulus with supercooled droplets at heights lower than their normal cruise altitudes, where contrails can form. Commercial aircraft can therefore generate ice and affect the clouds at temperatures as much as 30°C warmer than the −40°C contrail formation threshold temperature.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2009bams2905.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heymsfield, A. J., Kennedy, P. C., Massie, S., Schmitt, C., Wang, Z., Haimov, S., & Rangno, A.
Venue
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2010-06
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
753-766
ISSN
  • 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0477
OpenAlex
W2171461915
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0735110)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
altocumulus clouds, ice microphysics, supercooled water droplets, contrail formation, cloud seeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review