The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing Frequency and Intensity of Rainfall Extremes over India from 1951 to 2003
Open accessAbstract
Using a 1951–2003 gridded daily rainfall dataset for India, the authors assess trends in the intensity and frequency of exceedance of thresholds derived from the 90th and the 99th percentile of daily rainfall. A nonparametric method is used to test for monotonic trends at each location. A field significance test is also applied at the national level to assess whether the individual trends identified could occur by chance in an analysis of the large number of time series analyzed. Statistically significant increasing trends in extremes of rainfall are identified over many parts of India, consistent with the indications from climate change models and the hypothesis that the hydrological cycle will intensify as the planet warms. Specifically, for the exceedance of the 99th percentile of daily rainfall, all locations where a significant increasing trend in frequency of exceedance is identified also exhibit a significant trend in rainfall intensity. However, extreme precipitation frequency over many parts of India also appears to exhibit a decreasing trend, especially for the exceedance of the 90th percentile of daily rainfall. Predominantly increasing trends in the intensity of extreme rainfall are observed for both exceedance thresholds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Conceptual Framework for Changes of Extremes of the Hydrological Cycle with Climate Change
Trenberth, K. E. (1999) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1005488920935 · Cited by 571
Two Guidelines for Bootstrap Hypothesis Testing
Hall, P., & Wilson, S. R. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532163 · Cited by 471
Cited by
Climate Phenomena and their Relevance for Future Regional Climate Change
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.028 · Cited by 863
A threefold rise in widespread extreme rain events over central India
Roxy, M. K., Ghosh, S., Pathak, A., Athulya, R., Mujumdar, M., Murtugudde, R., Terray, P., & Rajeevan, M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00744-9 · Cited by 828
Rising Precipitation Extremes across Nepal
Karki, R., Hasson, S. U., Schickhoff, U., Scholten, T., & Böhner, J. (2017) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli5010004 · Cited by 286
Castino, F., Bookhagen, B., & Strecker, M. R. (2017) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3127-2 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnamurthy, C. K. B., Lall, U., & Kwon, H.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4737-4746
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2124343053
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
