The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Drought Indices Based on Thermal Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration over the Continental United States
Open accessAbstract
The reliability of standard meteorological drought indices based on measurements of precipitation is limited by the spatial distribution and quality of currently available rainfall data. Furthermore, they reflect only one component of the surface hydrologic cycle, and they cannot readily capture nonprecipitation-based moisture inputs to the land surface system (e.g., irrigation) that may temper drought impacts or variable rates of water consumption across a landscape. This study assesses the value of a new drought index based on remote sensing of evapotranspiration (ET). The evaporative stress index (ESI) quantifies anomalies in the ratio of actual to potential ET (PET), mapped using thermal band imagery from geostationary satellites. The study investigates the behavior and response time scales of the ESI through a retrospective comparison with the standardized precipitation indices and Palmer drought index suite, and with drought classifications recorded in the U.S. Drought Monitor for the 2000–09 growing seasons. Spatial and temporal correlation analyses suggest that the ESI performs similarly to short-term (up to 6 months) precipitation-based indices but can be produced at higher spatial resolution and without requiring any precipitation data. Unique behavior is observed in the ESI in regions where the evaporative flux is enhanced by moisture sources decoupled from local rainfall: for example, in areas of intense irrigation or shallow water table. Normalization by PET serves to isolate the ET signal component responding to soil moisture variability from variations due to the radiation load. This study suggests that the ESI is a useful complement to the current suite of drought indicators, with particular added value in parts of the world where rainfall data are sparse or unreliable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fisher, J. B., Melton, F., Middleton, E., Hain, C., Anderson, M., Allen, R., McCabe, M. F., Hook, S., Baldocchi, D., Townsend, P. A., et al. (2017) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2016wr020175 · Cited by 991
Self-citationRemote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities
AghaKouchak, A., Farahmand, A., Melton, F. S., Teixeira, J., Anderson, M. C., Wardlow, B. D., & Hain, C. R. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000456 · Cited by 989
Self-citationUse of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources
Anderson, M. C., Allen, R. G., Morse, A., & Kustas, W. P. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.025 · Cited by 734
Self-citationSheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat‐Capdevila, A., & Verbist, K. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2017wr022437 · Cited by 561
Drought evolution, severity and trends in mainland China over 1961–2013
Yao, N., Li, Y., Lei, T., & Peng, L. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.327 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, M. C., Hain, C., Wardlow, B., Pimstein, A., Mecikalski, J. R., & Kustas, W. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2011-04-15
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2025-2044
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W1969256532
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Drought Indices Based on Thermal Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration over the Continental United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/2010jcli3812.1
- The paper
- Anderson, M. C., Hain, C., Wardlow, B., Pimstein, A., Mecikalski, J. R., & Kustas, W. P. (2011). Evaluation of Drought Indices Based on Thermal Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration over the Continental United States. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3812.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.