The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layers and Diurnal Cycles: Challenges for Weather and Climate Models
Open accessAbstract
The representation of the atmospheric boundary layer is an important part of weather and climate models and impacts many applications such as air quality and wind energy. Over the years, the performance in modeling 2-m temperature and 10-m wind speed has improved but errors are still significant. This is in particular the case under clear skies and low wind speed conditions at night as well as during winter in stably stratified conditions over land and ice. In this paper, the authors review these issues and provide an overview of the current understanding and model performance. Results from weather forecast and climate models are used to illustrate the state of the art as well as findings and recommendations from three intercomparison studies held within the Global Energy and Water Exchanges (GEWEX) Atmospheric Boundary Layer Study (GABLS). Within GABLS, the focus has been on the examination of the representation of the stable boundary layer and the diurnal cycle over land in clear-sky conditions. For this purpose, single-column versions of weather and climate models have been compared with observations, research models, and large-eddy simulations. The intercomparison cases are based on observations taken in the Arctic, Kansas, and Cabauw in the Netherlands. From these studies, we find that even for the noncloudy boundary layer important parameterization challenges remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
The Minimum Wind Speed for Sustainable Turbulence in the Nocturnal Boundary Layer
Van de Wiel, B. J. H., Moene, A. F., Jonker, H. J. J., Baas, P., Basu, S., Donda, J. M. M., Sun, J., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (2012) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-12-0107.1 · Cited by 165
Self-citationContinuous Single-Column Model Evaluation at a Permanent Meteorological Supersite
Neggers, R. A. J., Siebesma, A. P., & Heus, T. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00162.1 · Cited by 117
Modelling the Arctic Stable Boundary Layer and its Coupling to the Surface
Steeneveld, G. J., Van De Wiel, B. J. H., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (2006) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/s10546-005-7771-z · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Cited by
LMDZ6A: The Atmospheric Component of the IPSL Climate Model With Improved and Better Tuned Physics
Hourdin, F., Rio, C., Grandpeix, J., Madeleine, J., Cheruy, F., Rochetin, N., Jam, A., Musat, I., Idelkadi, A., Fairhead, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001892 · Cited by 268
Williams, A. P., & Abatzoglou, J. T. (2016) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-016-0031-0 · Cited by 173
Couvreux, F., Hourdin, F., Williamson, D., Roehrig, R., Volodina, V., Villefranque, N., Rio, C., Audouin, O., Salter, J., Bazile, E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2020ms002217 · Cited by 121
Stable boundary‐layer regimes at Dome C, Antarctica: observation and analysis
Vignon, E., van de Wiel, B. J. H., van Hooijdonk, I. G. S., Genthon, C., van der Linden, S. J. A., van Hooft, J. A., Baas, P., Maurel, W., Traullé, O., & Casasanta, G. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.2998 · Cited by 110
Self-citationRegime Transitions in Near-Surface Temperature Inversions: A Conceptual Model
Van de Wiel, B. J. H., Vignon, E., Baas, P., van Hooijdonk, I. G. S., van der Linden, S. J. A., Antoon van Hooft, J., Bosveld, F. C., de Roode, S. R., Moene, A. F., & Genthon, C. (2017) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-16-0180.1 · Cited by 90
Self-citationBosveld, F. C., Baas, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., Holtslag, A. A. M., de Arellano, J. V.-G., & van de Wiel, B. J. H. (2020) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/s10546-020-00541-w · Cited by 82
Self-citationKotchenruther, R. A. (2016) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.048 · Cited by 69
Maillard, J., Raut, J.-C., & Ravetta, F. (2024) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-17-3303-2024 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Holtslag, A. A. M., Svensson, G., Baas, P., Basu, S., Beare, B., Beljaars, A. C. M., Bosveld, F. C., Cuxart, J., Lindvall, J., Steeneveld, G. J., Tjernström, M., & Van De Wiel, B. J. H.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1691-1706
- ISSN
- 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0477
- OpenAlex
- W2142020740
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
