The Great Colorado Flood of September 2013
Open accessAbstract
During the second week of September 2013, a seasonally uncharacteristic weather pattern stalled over the Rocky Mountain Front Range region of northern Colorado bringing with it copious amounts of moisture from the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean. This feed of moisture was funneled toward the east-facing mountain slopes through a series of mesoscale circulation features, resulting in several days of unusually widespread heavy rainfall over steep mountainous terrain. Catastrophic flooding ensued within several Front Range river systems that washed away highways, destroyed towns, isolated communities, necessitated days of airborne evacuations, and resulted in eight fatalities. The impacts from heavy rainfall and flooding were felt over a broad region of northern Colorado leading to 18 counties being designated as federal disaster areas and resulting in damages exceeding $2 billion (U.S. dollars). This study explores the meteorological and hydrological ingredients that led to this extreme event. After providing a basic timeline of events, synoptic and mesoscale circulation features of the event are discussed. Particular focus is placed on documenting how circulation features, embedded within the larger synoptic flow, served to funnel moist inflow into the mountain front driving several days of sustained orographic precipitation. Operational and research networks of polarimetric radar and surface instrumentation were used to evaluate the cloud structures and dominant hydrometeor characteristics. The performance of several quantitative precipitation estimates, quantitative precipitation forecasts, and hydrological forecast products are also analyzed with the intention of identifying what monitoring and prediction tools worked and where further improvements are needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the extreme precipitation event in the Colorado Front Range in September 2013, the stratification was close to moist adiabatic.
“This moist static stability will be small if the stratification is close to moist adiabatic, as was the case, for example, in the extreme precipitation event in the Colorado Front Range in September 2013 [26].”
From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 233
- Authors
- Gochis, D., Schumacher, R., Friedrich, K., Doesken, N., Kelsch, M., Sun, J., Ikeda, K., Lindsey, D., Wood, A., Dolan, B., Matrosov, S., Newman, A., Mahoney, K., Rutledge, S., Johnson, R., Kucera, P., Kennedy, P., Sempere-Torres, D., Steiner, M., Roberts, R., Wilson, J., Yu, W., Chandrasekar, V., Rasmussen, R., Anderson, A., & Brown, B.
- Affiliations
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Centre de Recerca Aplicada en Hidrometeorologia, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- ORCID
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1461-1487
- ISSN
- 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0477
- OpenAlex
- W2018997274
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 16.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- heavy rainfall, orographic precipitation, mesoscale circulation, synoptic flow, moisture transport, Front Range, polarimetric radar, quantitative precipitation estimation, quantitative precipitation forecasting, hydrological forecasting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review