Cited by 19Disaster Management and ResilienceClimate Change Communication and PerceptionRisk Perception and Management

Why People Adopt Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction Behaviors Integrated Model of Risk Communication and Results from Hurricanes, Floods, and Wildfires

Lim, JungKyu Rhys·2022·Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Abstract

With climate change, weather and climate disaster risks are increasing. At-risk individuals can take climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction behaviors to mitigate and prepare for disaster risks, reduce costs from damage, and save their lives. However, previous fragmented studies have not provided an integrated model to directly compare the factors and identify factors that are most influential in at-risk community members’ behaviors. I present the Integrated Model of Risk Communication by consolidating major theories. This study uses structural equation modeling of quantitative surveys to simultaneously test the impacts of 15 factors on 15 adaptation behaviors for the two most common federally declared disasters (wildfires, hurricanes with floods) in three disaster-prone U.S. states (California, Florida, and Texas) (N = 3,468). Specifically, this study examines 15 behaviors including preparedness, non-structural mitigation, structural mitigation, insurance purchase, and adaptation policy support. Social norms perceptions, self-efficacy, response efficacy, and resource constraints strongly affect behaviors. Response efficacy strongly affects policy support. Risk perception, knowledge, and climate change perception—commonly argued to be key drivers—are insignificant or weak. The model explains 55%-86% of the variance in adaptation behaviors. Results suggest that the focus of adaptation efforts may need to shift from risk perception to efficacy and social norms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/bams-d-21-0087.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Lim, J. R.
Affiliations
World Bank (US)
Corresponding author
Lim, JungKyu Rhys
Venue
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2022-04-01
ISSN
  • 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0477
OpenAlex
W4220816356
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction, behavioral adaptation, risk communication, hurricanes, floods, forest fires, social norms, self-efficacy, response efficacy, resource constraints, insurance purchasing, disaster preparedness, non-structural mitigation, structural mitigation, risk perception, climate change perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review