The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Radiation Algorithm with Correlated-k Distribution. Part I: Local Thermal Equilibrium
Abstract
A new radiation scheme is proposed that uses the correlated-k distribution (CKD) method. The definition of the k-distribution function, the transformation between frequency space and k space, and the upper limit of the absorption coefficient in cumulative probability space (CPS) are discussed. The corresponding relation between each interval in CPS and the heating rate profile provides a method for determining the width of intervals in CPS. Three schemes are discussed for handling the spectral overlap of gases. Method 1 rearranges the appropriate combination of gaseous absorption coefficients when the spectral overlap of two gases is extensive. Method 2 applies to most overlapping gases and addresses the most important aspects of each gas’s spectrum in each interval of CPS. Method 3 applies to weak gases only and seeks to adjust the main absorption coefficients in order that radiative forcing at the surface and the top of the atmosphere is correct. This model is quite efficient because 1) relatively few intervals in CPS are used (up to 1 mb, only 35 intervals for solar radiation, and 46 for infrared); 2) for some intervals with very large absorption coefficients, the radiative transfer process is simplified by ignoring scattering; 3) the water vapor continuum is dealt with efficiently by neglecting its effect in some nonimportant intervals in CPS and at high altitudes; and 4) gaseous overlap methods are simple and effective. Moreover, this model contains a proper treatment of spectral overlap between solar and infrared radiation. For both solar and infrared radiation, heating rate errors are generally less than 0.2 K day−1, and errors in flux at the surface and the top of the atmosphere are generally less than 1 W m−2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lacis, A. A., & Oinas, V. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/90jd01945 · Cited by 1,051
Cited by
Technical Note: The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere
Scinocca, J. F., McFarlane, N. A., Lazare, M., Li, J., & Plummer, D. (2008) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-8-7055-2008 · Cited by 459
Self-citationChylek, P., Li, J., Dubey, M. K., Wang, M., & Lesins, G. (2011) · doi:10.5194/acpd-11-22893-2011 · Cited by 331
Self-citationDavis, A. B., & Marshak, A. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/2/026801 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., & Barker, H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286-309
- ISSN
- 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0469
- OpenAlex
- W2082894652
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Radiation Algorithm with Correlated-k Distribution. Part I: Local Thermal Equilibrium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jas-3396.1
- The paper
- Li, J., & Barker, H. W. (2005). A Radiation Algorithm with Correlated-k Distribution. Part I: Local Thermal Equilibrium. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-3396.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.