Cited by 87Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Tropical Precipitation Extremes

Open access
Rossow, William B., Mekonnen, Ademe, Pearl, Cindy, Goncalves, Weber·2013·Journal of Climate

Abstract

Classifying tropical deep convective systems by the mesoscale distribution of their cloud properties and sorting matching precipitation measurements over an 11-yr period reveals that the whole distribution of instantaneous precipitation intensity and daily average accumulation rate is composed of (at least) two separate distributions representing distinctly different types of deep convection associated with different meteorological conditions (the distributions of non-deep-convective situations are also shown for completeness). The two types of deep convection produce very different precipitation intensities and occur with very different frequencies of occurrence. Several previous studies have shown that the interaction of the large-scale tropical circulation with deep convection causes switching between these two types, leading to a substantial increase of precipitation. In particular, the extreme portion of the tropical precipitation intensity distribution, above 2 mm h−1, is produced by 40% of the larger, longer-lived mesoscale-organized type of convection with only about 10% of the ordinary convection occurrences producing such intensities. When average precipitation accumulation rates are considered, essentially all of the values above 2 mm h−1 are produced by the mesoscale systems. Yet today’s atmospheric models do not represent mesoscale-organized deep convective systems that are generally larger than current-day circulation model grid cell sizes but smaller than the resolved dynamical scales and last longer than the typical physics time steps. Thus, model-based arguments for how the extreme part of the tropical precipitation distribution might change in a warming climate are suspect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00725.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global climate models are unable to represent mesoscale convective organization.

    “the inability of the models to represent mesoscale convective organization [72]”

    From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dy- namics. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 44, Academic Press, 880 pp.
  2. Emanuel, K. A., 1994: Atmospheric Convection. Oxford University Press, 580 pp.

Authors
Rossow, W. B., Mekonnen, A., Pearl, C., & Goncalves, W.
Affiliations
  • City College of New York (US)
  • North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2013-02-15
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1457-1466
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2131856289
Cited by
87
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
  • Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
deep convection, climate model resolution, climate change projections, tropical cyclones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review