The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seasonal Predictions of Tropical Cyclones Using a 25-km-Resolution General Circulation Model
Abstract
Retrospective seasonal predictions of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the three major ocean basins of the Northern Hemisphere are performed from 1990 to 2010 using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory High-Resolution Atmospheric Model (HiRAM) at 25-km resolution. Atmospheric states are initialized for each forecast, with the sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) “persisted” from that at the starting time during the 5-month forecast period (July–November). Using a five-member ensemble, it is shown that the storm counts of both tropical storm (TS) and hurricane categories are highly predictable in the North Atlantic basin during the 21-yr period. The correlations between the 21-yr observed and model predicted storm counts are 0.88 and 0.89 for hurricanes and TSs, respectively. The prediction in the eastern North Pacific is skillful, but it is not as outstanding as that in the North Atlantic. The persistent SSTA assumption appears to be less robust for the western North Pacific, contributing to less skillful predictions in that region. The relative skill in the prediction of storm counts is shown to be consistent with the quality of the predicted large-scale environment in the three major basins. It is shown that intensity distribution of TCs can be captured well by the model if the central sea level pressure is used as the threshold variable instead of the commonly used 10-m wind speed. This demonstrates the feasibility of using the 25-km-resolution HiRAM, a general circulation model designed initially for long-term climate simulations, to study the impacts of climate change on the intensity distribution of TCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.
Emanuel, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03906 · Cited by 4,013
Cited by
Seasonal Prediction of Tropical Cyclones over the North Atlantic and Western North Pacific
Befort, D. J., Hodges, K. I., & Weisheimer, A. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-21-0041.1 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J.-H., & Lin, S.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2013-01-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 380-398
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W1989379867
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal Predictions of Tropical Cyclones Using a 25-km-Resolution General Circulation Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00061.1
- The paper
- Chen, J.-H., & Lin, S.-J. (2013). Seasonal Predictions of Tropical Cyclones Using a 25-km-Resolution General Circulation Model. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00061.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.