The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations*
Abstract
The ratio of warming to cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide has been shown to be approximately independent of time and emissions scenarios and directly relates emissions to temperature. It is therefore a potentially important tool for climate mitigation policy. The transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions (TCRE), defined as the ratio of global-mean warming to cumulative emissions at CO2 doubling in a 1% yr−1 CO2 increase experiment, ranges from 0.8 to 2.4 K EgC−1 in 15 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)—a somewhat broader range than that found in a previous generation of carbon–climate models. Using newly available simulations and a new observational temperature dataset to 2010, TCRE is estimated from observations by dividing an observationally constrained estimate of CO2-attributable warming by an estimate of cumulative carbon emissions to date, yielding an observationally constrained 5%–95% range of 0.7–2.0 K EgC−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets
Friedlingstein, P., Andrew, R. M., Rogelj, J., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Knutti, R., Luderer, G., Raupach, M. R., Schaeffer, M., van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2014) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2248 · Cited by 771
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6
Gillett, N. P., Shiogama, H., Funke, B., Hegerl, G., Knutti, R., Matthes, K., Santer, B. D., Stone, D., & Tebaldi, C. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3685-2016 · Cited by 597
Self-citationJones, M. W., Peters, G. P., Gasser, T., Andrew, R. M., Schwingshackl, C., Gütschow, J., Houghton, R. A., Friedlingstein, P., Pongratz, J., & Le Quéré, C. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02041-1 · Cited by 518
Allen, M. R., Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Millar, R. J., Cain, M., Frame, D. J., & Macey, A. H. (2018) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8 · Cited by 410
Self-citationJones, C. D., Arora, V., Friedlingstein, P., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Dunne, J., Graven, H., Hoffman, F., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Matthews, D., & Allen, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2013-09-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 6844-6858
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2077042386
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1
- The paper
- Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Matthews, D., & Allen, M. R. (2013). Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations*. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00476.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.