The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models
Open accessAbstract
This work documents how the midlatitude, eddy-driven jets respond to climate change using model output from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The authors consider separately the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, and the Southern Hemisphere jets. The analysis is not limited to annual-mean changes in the latitude and speed of the jets, but also explores how the variability of each jet changes with increased greenhouse gases. All jets are found to migrate poleward with climate change: the Southern Hemisphere jet shifts poleward by 2° of latitude between the historical period and the end of the twenty-first century in the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario, whereas both Northern Hemisphere jets shift by only 1°. In addition, the speed of the Southern Hemisphere jet is found to increase markedly (by 1.2 m s−1 between 850 and 700 hPa), while the speed remains nearly constant for both jets in the Northern Hemisphere. More importantly, it is found that the patterns of jet variability are a strong function of the jet position in all three sectors of the globe, and as the jets shift poleward the patterns of variability change. Specifically, for the Southern Hemisphere and the North Atlantic jets, the variability becomes less of a north–south wobbling and more of a pulsing (i.e., variation in jet speed). In contrast, for the North Pacific jet, the variability becomes less of a pulsing and more of a north–south wobbling. These different responses can be understood in terms of Rossby wave breaking, allowing the authors to explain most of the projected jet changes within a single dynamical framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.-K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00015.1 · Cited by 4,852
Annular Modes in the Extratropical Circulation. Part I: Month-to-Month Variability*
Thompson, D. W. J., & Wallace, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1000:amitec>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,403
THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research
Meehl, G. A., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, J. F. B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-9-1383 · Cited by 2,826
Lanczos Filtering in One and Two Dimensions
Duchon, C. E. (1979) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<1016:lfioat>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,398
The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact
(2003) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm134 · Cited by 1,648
A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate
Yin, J. H. (2005) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2005gl023684 · Cited by 1,159
Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere
(1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd900445 · Cited by 1,066
Wind-driven trends in Antarctic sea-ice drift
Holland, P. R., & Kwok, R. (2012) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1627 · Cited by 658
Woollings, T., Hannachi, A., & Hoskins, B. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.625 · Cited by 629
Hall, A., & Visbeck, M. (2002) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3043:svitsh>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 569
Cited by
Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models
Ceppi, P., Brient, F., Zelinka, M. D., & Hartmann, D. L. (2017) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.465 · Cited by 430
Connections Between Clouds, Radiation, and Midlatitude Dynamics: a Review
Ceppi, P., & Hartmann, D. L. (2015) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0010-x · Cited by 384
The influence of future changes in springtime Arctic ozone on stratospheric and surface climate
Chiodo, G., Friedel, M., Seeber, S., Domeisen, D., Stenke, A., Sukhodolov, T., & Zilker, F. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, E. A., & Polvani, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2013-09-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7117-7135
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2145325243
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 31.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00536.1
- The paper
- Barnes, E. A., & Polvani, L. (2013). Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00536.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.