The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assimilation of Time-Averaged Pseudoproxies for Climate Reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
The efficacy of a novel ensemble data assimilation (DA) technique is examined in the climate field reconstruction (CFR) of surface temperature. A minimalistic, computationally inexpensive DA technique is employed that requires only a static ensemble of climatologically plausible states. Pseudoproxy experiments are performed with both general circulation model (GCM) and Twentieth Century Reanalysis (20CR) data by reconstructing surface temperature fields from a sparse network of noisy pseudoproxies. The DA approach is compared to a conventional CFR approach based on principal component analysis (PCA) for experiments on global domains. DA outperforms PCA in reconstructing global-mean temperature in all experiments and is more consistent across experiments, with a range of time series correlations of 0.69–0.94 compared to 0.19–0.87 for the PCA method. DA improvements are even more evident in spatial reconstruction skill, especially in sparsely sampled pseudoproxy regions and for 20CR experiments. It is hypothesized that DA improves spatial reconstructions because it relies on coherent, spatially local temperature patterns, which remain robust even when glacial states are used to reconstruct nonglacial states and vice versa. These local relationships, as utilized by DA, appear to be more robust than the orthogonal patterns of variability utilized by PCA. Comparing results for GCM and 20CR data indicates that pseudoproxy experiments that rely solely on GCM data may give a false impression of reconstruction skill.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391 · cited 2×
“Assuming Gaussiandistributed errors, the classical solution is given by the ‘‘update equation’’ for the Kalman filter (Kalnay 2003):”
Method
Cited by
Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., & Poulsen, C. J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x · Cited by 573
Self-citationThe last millennium climate reanalysis project: Framework and first results
Hakim, G. J., Emile‐Geay, J., Steig, E. J., Noone, D., Anderson, D. M., Tardif, R., Steiger, N., & Perkins, W. A. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2016jd024751 · Cited by 293
Self-citationWidespread six degrees Celsius cooling on land during the Last Glacial Maximum
Seltzer, A. M., Ng, J., Aeschbach, W., Kipfer, R., Kulongoski, J. T., Severinghaus, J. P., & Stute, M. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03467-6 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiger, N. J., Hakim, G. J., Steig, E. J., Battisti, D. S., & Roe, G. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 426-441
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2140001392
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assimilation of Time-Averaged Pseudoproxies for Climate Reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00693.1
- The paper
- Steiger, N. J., Hakim, G. J., Steig, E. J., Battisti, D. S., & Roe, G. H. (2014). Assimilation of Time-Averaged Pseudoproxies for Climate Reconstruction. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00693.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.