The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CMIP5 Projections of Arctic Amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic Circulation, and of Their Relationship
Abstract
Recent studies have hypothesized that Arctic amplification, the enhanced warming of the Arctic region compared to the rest of the globe, will cause changes in midlatitude weather over the twenty-first century. This study exploits the recently completed phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and examines 27 state-of-the-art climate models to determine if their projected changes in the midlatitude circulation are consistent with the hypothesized impact of Arctic amplification over North America and the North Atlantic. Under the largest future greenhouse forcing (RCP8.5), it is found that every model, in every season, exhibits Arctic amplification by 2100. At the same time, the projected circulation responses are either opposite in sign to those hypothesized or too widely spread among the models to discern any robust change. However, in a few seasons and for some of the circulation metrics examined, correlations are found between the model spread in Arctic amplification and the model spread in the projected circulation changes. Therefore, while the CMIP5 models offer some evidence that future Arctic warming may be able to modulate some aspects of the midlatitude circulation response in some seasons, the analysis herein leads to the conclusion that the net circulation response in the future is unlikely to be determined solely—or even primarily—by Arctic warming according to the sequence of events recently hypothesized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Cited by
Arctic amplification is caused by sea-ice loss under increasing CO2
Dai, A., Luo, D., Song, M., & Liu, J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07954-9 · Cited by 659
Hari, V., Rakovec, O., Markonis, Y., Hanel, M., & Kumar, R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68872-9 · Cited by 485
Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models
Screen, J. A., Deser, C., Smith, D. M., Zhang, X., Blackport, R., Kushner, P. J., Oudar, T., McCusker, K. E., & Sun, L. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0059-y · Cited by 382
Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic
Overland, J. E., Dethloff, K., Francis, J. A., Hall, R. J., Hanna, E., Kim, S.-J., Screen, J. A., Shepherd, T. G., & Vihma, T. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3121 · Cited by 371
Vihma, T., Screen, J., Tjernström, M., Newton, B., Zhang, X., Popova, V., Deser, C., Holland, M., & Prowse, T. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1002/2015jg003132 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, E. A., & Polvani, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5254-5271
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2050962553
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CMIP5 Projections of Arctic Amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic Circulation, and of Their Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00589.1
- The paper
- Barnes, E. A., & Polvani, L. M. (2015). CMIP5 Projections of Arctic Amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic Circulation, and of Their Relationship. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00589.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.