The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Revisited
Abstract
The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO), the dominant year-round pattern of monthly North Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) variability, is an important target of ongoing research within the meteorological and climate dynamics communities and is central to the work of many geologists, ecologists, natural resource managers, and social scientists. Research over the last 15 years has led to an emerging consensus: the PDO is not a single phenomenon, but is instead the result of a combination of different physical processes, including both remote tropical forcing and local North Pacific atmosphere–ocean interactions, which operate on different time scales to drive similar PDO-like SST anomaly patterns. How these processes combine to generate the observed PDO evolution, including apparent regime shifts, is shown using simple autoregressive models of increasing spatial complexity. Simulations of recent climate in coupled GCMs are able to capture many aspects of the PDO, but do so based on a balance of processes often more independent of the tropics than is observed. Finally, it is suggested that the assessment of PDO-related regional climate impacts, reconstruction of PDO-related variability into the past with proxy records, and diagnosis of Pacific variability within coupled GCMs should all account for the effects of these different processes, which only partly represent the direct forcing of the atmosphere by North Pacific Ocean SSTs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SST anomalies in the Pacific respond to multiple processes: atmosphere-ocean interaction, ENSO, SST re-emergence and the SSTA patterns described by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.
“SST anomalies in the Pacific respond to multiple processes: atmosphere-ocean interaction, ENSO, SST re-emergence and the SSTA patterns described by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation50.”
From Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Temporal coherence in North Pacific sea-surface temperature patterns
Namias, J., & Born, R. M. (1970) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jc075i030p05952 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Initialized Earth System prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales
Meehl, G. A., Richter, J. H., Teng, H., Capotondi, A., Cobb, K., Doblas-Reyes, F., Donat, M. G., England, M. H., Fyfe, J. C., Han, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00155-x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationTendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies
Bulgin, C. E., Merchant, C. J., & Ferreira, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64785-9 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
ENSO Impact on Marine Fisheries and Ecosystems
Lehodey, P., Bertrand, A., Hobday, A. J., Kiyofuji, H., McClatchie, S., Menkès, C. E., Pilling, G., Polovina, J., & Tommasi, D. (2020) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1002/9781119548164.ch19 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Subseasonal predictability of the North Atlantic Oscillation
Albers, J. R., & Newman, M. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abe781 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Newman, M., Alexander, M. A., Ault, T. R., Cobb, K. M., Deser, C., Di Lorenzo, E., Mantua, N. J., Miller, A. J., Minobe, S., Nakamura, H., Schneider, N., Vimont, D. J., Phillips, A. S., Scott, J. D., & Smith, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2016-06-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4399-4427
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2294682052
- Cited by
- 1,318
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 98 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 31
- FWCI
- 93.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H01606, 26610146, 26287110, 16H01844)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Keywords
- Pacific Decadal Oscillation, tropical forcing, ocean-atmosphere interaction, tipping points, autoregressive models, paleoclimate reconstruction, climate change impacts, ocean-atmosphere feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review