Cited by 139Climate variability and modelsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The Interdecadal Shift of ENSO Properties in 1999/2000: A Review

Hu, Zeng-Zhen, Kumar, Arun, Huang, Bohua, Zhu, Jieshun, L’Heureux, Michelle, McPhaden, Michael J., Yu, Jin-Yi·2020·Journal of Climate

Abstract

Following the interdecadal shift of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) properties that occurred in 1976/77, another regime shift happened in 1999/2000 that featured a decrease of variability and an increase in ENSO frequency. Specifically, the frequency spectrum of Niño-3.4 sea surface temperature shifted from dominant variations at quasi-quadrennial (~4 yr) periods during 1979–99 to weaker fluctuations at quasi-biennial (~2 yr) periods during 2000–18. Also, the spectrum of warm water volume (WWV) index had almost no peak in 2000–18, implying a nearly white noise process. The regime shift was associated with an enhanced zonal gradient of the mean state, a westward shift in the atmosphere–ocean coupling in the tropical Pacific, and an increase in the static stability of the troposphere. This shift had several important implications. The whitening of the subsurface ocean temperature led to a breakdown of the relationship between WWV and ENSO, reducing the efficacy of WWV as a key predictor for ENSO and thus leading to a decrease in ENSO prediction skill. Another consequence of the higher ENSO frequency after 1999/2000 was that the forecasted peak of sea surface temperature anomaly often lagged that observed by several months, and the lag increased with the lead time. The ENSO regime shift may have altered ENSO influences on extratropical climate. Thus, the regime shift of ENSO in 1999/2000 as well as the model default may account for the higher false alarm and lower skill in p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli-d-19-0316.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper's result is opposite to an observed decline in ENSO variability since 1999/2000.

    “We also note that our result is opposite to an observed decline in ENSO variability since 1999/2000 (ref.24 ); however, any greenhouse warming-induced ENSO variability change in the two decades since 1999/2000 might be masked by decadal variability and not yet detectable.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 144 · Cited by 139

Authors
Hu, Z.-Z., Kumar, A., Huang, B., Zhu, J., L’Heureux, M., McPhaden, M. J., & Yu, J.-Y.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
4441-4462
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W3008619305
Cited by
139
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (AGS-1338427)
  • NASA (NNX14AM19G)
  • NOAA (NA14OAR4310160 and NA17OAR4310144)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
ENSO, interdecadal variability, ENSO frequency, Niño 3.4 sea surface temperature, subsurface ocean temperature, ENSO predictability, static stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review