Cited by 83Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Role of net surface heat flux in seasonal variations of sea surface temperature in the tropical Atlantic Ocean

Open access
Yu, Lisan, Jin, Xiangze, Weller, Robert A.·2006·Journal of Climate

Abstract

The present study used a new net surface heat flux (Qnet) product obtained from the Objective Analyzed Air–Sea Fluxes (OAFlux) project and the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) to examine two specific issues—one is to which degree Qnet controls seasonal variations of sea surface temperature (SST) in the tropical Atlantic Ocean (20°S–20°N, east of 60°W), and the other is whether the physical relation can serve as a measure to evaluate the physical representation of a heat flux product. To better address the two issues, the study included the analysis of three additional heat flux products: the Southampton Oceanographic Centre (SOC) heat flux analysis based on ship reports, and the model fluxes from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis and the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40). The study also uses the monthly subsurface temperature fields from the World Ocean Atlas to help analyze the seasonal changes of the mixed layer depth (hMLD). The study showed that the tropical Atlantic sector could be divided into two regimes based on the influence level of Qnet. SST variability poleward of 5°S and 10°N is dominated by the annual cycle of Qnet. In these regions the warming (cooling) of the sea surface is highly correlated with the increased (decreased) Qnet confined in a relatively shallow (deep) hMLD. The seasonal evolution of SST variability is well predicted by simply relating the local Qnet with a variable hMLD. On the other hand, the influence of Qnet diminishes in the deep Tropics within 5°S and 10°N and ocean dynamic processes play a dominant role. The dynamics-induced changes in SST are most evident along the two belts, one of which is located on the equator and the other off the equator at about 3°N in the west, which tilts to about 10°N near the northwestern African coast. The study also showed that if the degree of consistency between the correlation relationships of Qnet, hMLD, and SST variability serves as a measure of the quality of the Qnet product, then the Qnet from OAFlux + ISCCP and ERA-40 are most physically representative, followed by SOC. The NCEP–NCAR Qnet is least representative. It should be noted that the Qnet from OAFlux + ISCCP and ERA-40 have a quite different annual mean pattern. OAFlux + ISCCP agrees with SOC in that the tropical Atlantic sector gains heat from the atmosphere on the annual mean basis, where the ERA-40 and the NCEP–NCAR model reanalyses indicate that positive Qnet occurs only in the narrow equatorial band and in the eastern portion of the tropical basin. Nevertheless, seasonal variances of the Qnet from OAFlux + ISCCP and ERA-40 are very similar once the respective mean is removed, which explains why the two agree with each other in accounting for the seasonal variability of SST. In summary, the study suggests that an accurate estimation of surface heat flux is crucially important for understanding and predicting SST fluctuations in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. It also suggests that future emphasis on improving the surface heat flux estimation should be placed more on reducing the mean bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jcli3970.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. de Boyer Montegut, C., G. Madec, A. S. Fischer, A. Lazar, and D. Iudicone, 2004: Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C12003, doi:10.1029/2004JC002378. · DOI
  2. Foltz, G. R., S. A. Grodsky, J. A. Carton, and M. J. McPhaden, 2003: Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical At- lantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3146, doi:10.1029/ 2002JC001584. · DOI · Paper page
  3. --, A. Ffield, and Q. Yao, 2003: North Brazil Current rings and the variability in the latitude of the retroflection. Interhemi- spheric Water Exchanges in the Atlantic Ocean, J. Goni and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, Eds., Elsevier Oceanographic Series, Vol. 68, Elsevier, 357-373.
  4. --, and P. J. Lamb, 1978: Heat Budget Atlas of the Tropical Atlantic and Eastern Pacific Oceans. University of Wisconsin Press, 103 pp.
  5. Levitus, S., and T. P. Boyer, 1994: Temperature. Vol. 4, World Ocean Atlas 1994, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 4, 117 pp.
  6. Uppala, S., J. K. Gibson, M. Fiorino, A. Hernandez, P. Kallberg, L. Xu, K. Onogi, and S. Saarinen, 1999: ECMWF second generation re-analysis ERA40. Proc. of the Second WCRP Int. Conf. on Re-Analyses, Wokefield Park, Reading, United Kingdom, WCRP, 9-13.
  7. --, and J. A. Carton, 2004: Tropical Atlantic variability: Pat- terns, mechanisms, and impacts. Earth Climate: The Ocean- Atmosphere Interaction, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 147, Amer. Geophys. Union, 121-142.
  8. Zhang, Y.-C., W. B. Rossow, A. A. Lacis, V. Oinas, and M. I. Mishchenko, 2004: Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other glob- al data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19105, doi:10.1029/ 2003JD004457. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, L., Jin, X., & Weller, R. A.
Affiliations
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2006-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
23
Pages
6153-6169
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2004882195
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA17RJ1223)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
net surface heat flux, sea surface temperature, seasonal variation, tropical Atlantic, mixed layer depth, air-sea fluxes, ISCCP, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, ERA-40, subsurface temperature, equatorial upwelling, western boundary currents, Atlantic meridional overturning circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review