A Real-Time Automated Quality Control of Hourly Rain Gauge Data Based on Multiple Sensors in MRMS System
Abstract
Abstract Automated rain gauge networks provide direct measurements of precipitation and have been used for numerous applications, such as generating regional and national precipitation maps, calibrating remote sensing quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE), and validating hydrological and meteorological model predictions. However, automated gauge observations are prone to be affected by a variety of error sources and require a careful quality-control (QC) procedure. Many previous gauge QC techniques were based on spatiotemporal checks within the gauge network itself, and their effectiveness can be dependent on gauge densities and precipitation regimes. The current study takes advantage of the multisensor data sources in the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) system and develops an automated and computationally efficient gauge QC scheme based on the consistency of hourly gauge and radar QPE observations. Radar and gauge error characteristics related to radar sampling geometry, precipitation regimes, and freezing-level height is utilized within this scheme. This QC scheme is evaluated by testing its capability to identify suspect gauges and comparing the ability to quality-controlled gauges through statistical and spatial comparisons of gauge-influenced gridded QPE products. Spatial analysis of the gridded QPE products in MRMS resulted in a more physical spatial QPE distribution using quality-controlled gauges versus the same product created with non-quality-controlled gauge data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, and isolation forests have been applied to classify outliers, significantly improving detection accuracy of anomalous precipitation data.
“For example, machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, and isolation forests have been applied to classify outliers, significantly improving the detection accuracy of anomalous precipitation data [36][37][38][39].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quality control of a global hourly rainfall dataset
Lewis, E., Pritchard, D., Villalobos-Herrera, R., Blenkinsop, S., McClean, F., Guerreiro, S., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., et al. (2021) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105169 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Automatic quality control of weather data for timely decisions in agriculture
Dandrifosse, S., Jago, A., Huart, J. P., Michaud, V., Planchon, V., & Rosillon, D. (2024) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100445 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data
Sun, H., Zhou, Q., Shi, L., Li, C., Qin, S., Yao, D., Xu, M., Huang, Y., Hu, Q., & Guan, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17243976 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qi, Y., Martinaitis, S., Zhang, J., & Cocks, S.
- Affiliations
- Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies (US)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qi, Youcun
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2016-05-24
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1675-1691
- ISSN
- 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-755X
- OpenAlex
- W2338137192
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hydrometeorology (publishedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- radar quantitative precipitation estimation, freezing level height, precipitation regime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review