The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Complex Terrain
Abstract
This paper describes a flexible method to generate ensemble gridded fields of precipitation in complex terrain. The method is based on locally weighted regression, in which spatial attributes from station locations are used as explanatory variables to predict spatial variability in precipitation. For each time step, regression models are used to estimate the conditional cumulative distribution function (cdf) of precipitation at each grid cell (conditional on daily precipitation totals from a sparse station network), and ensembles are generated by using realizations from correlated random fields to extract values from the gridded precipitation cdfs. Daily high-resolution precipitation ensembles are generated for a 300 km × 300 km section of western Colorado (dx = 2 km) for the period 1980–2003. The ensemble precipitation grids reproduce the climatological precipitation gradients and observed spatial correlation structure. Probabilistic verification shows that the precipitation estimates are reliable, in the sense that there is close agreement between the frequency of occurrence of specific precipitation events in different probability categories and the probability that is estimated from the ensemble. The probabilistic estimates have good discrimination in the sense that the estimated probabilities differ significantly between cases when specific precipitation events occur and when they do not. The method may be improved by merging the gauge-based precipitation ensembles with remotely sensed precipitation estimates from ground-based radar and satellites, or with precipitation and wind fields from numerical weather prediction models. The stochastic modeling framework developed in this study is flexible and can easily accommodate additional modifications and improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality
McMillan, H., Krueger, T., & Freer, J. (2012) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.9384 · Cited by 522
Vrugt, J. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004838 · Cited by 334
Gridded Ensemble Precipitation and Temperature Estimates for the Contiguous United States
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Craig, J., Nijssen, B., Wood, A., Gutmann, E., Mizukami, N., Brekke, L., & Arnold, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-15-0026.1 · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, M. P., & Slater, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-22
- ISSN
- 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-755X
- OpenAlex
- W2003346696
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Complex Terrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jhm474.1
- The paper
- Clark, M. P., & Slater, A. G. (2006). Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Complex Terrain. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm474.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.