A Distributed Snow-Evolution Modeling System (SnowModel)
Open accessAbstract
SnowModel is a spatially distributed snow-evolution modeling system designed for application in landscapes, climates, and conditions where snow occurs. It is an aggregation of four submodels: MicroMet defines meteorological forcing conditions, EnBal calculates surface energy exchanges, SnowPack simulates snow depth and water-equivalent evolution, and SnowTran-3D accounts for snow redistribution by wind. Since each of these submodels was originally developed and tested for nonforested conditions, details describing modifications made to the submodels for forested areas are provided. SnowModel was created to run on grid increments of 1 to 200 m and temporal increments of 10 min to 1 day. It can also be applied using much larger grid increments, if the inherent loss in high-resolution (subgrid) information is acceptable. Simulated processes include snow accumulation; blowing-snow redistribution and sublimation; forest canopy interception, unloading, and sublimation; snow-density evolution; and snowpack melt. Conceptually, SnowModel includes the first-order physics required to simulate snow evolution within each of the global snow classes (i.e., ice, tundra, taiga, alpine/mountain, prairie, maritime, and ephemeral). The required model inputs are 1) temporally varying fields of precipitation, wind speed and direction, air temperature, and relative humidity obtained from meteorological stations and/or an atmospheric model located within or near the simulation domain; and 2) spatially distributed fields of topography and vegetation type. SnowModel’s ability to simulate seasonal snow evolution was compared against observations in both forested and nonforested landscapes. The model closely reproduced observed snow-water-equivalent distribution, time evolution, and interannual variability patterns.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 609
- Authors
- Liston, G. E., & Elder, K.
- Affiliations
- Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (US)
- Rocky Mountain Research Station (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1259-1276
- ISSN
- 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-755X
- OpenAlex
- W2105991219
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Hydrometeorology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0229973)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG511710, NNG04GP59G)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA17RJ1228)
- Agricultural Research Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Keywords
- SnowModel, blowing snow, wind redistribution of snow, snow sublimation, forest canopy interception, snow depth, snow water equivalent, surface energy balance, meteorological forcing, snow density, forest landscape
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review