Cited by 33Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Seasonality of Deep Cycle Turbulence in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific

Pham, Hieu T., Smyth, William D., Sarkar, Sutanu, Moum, James N.·2017·Journal of Physical Oceanography

Abstract

The seasonal cycles of the various oceanic and atmospheric factors influencing the deep cycle of turbulence in the eastern Pacific cold tongue are explored. Moored observations at 140°W have shown seasonal variability in the stratification, velocity shear, and turbulence above the Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC). In boreal spring, the thermocline and EUC shoal and turbulence decreases. Marginal instability (clustering of the local gradient Richardson number around the critical value of 1/4), evident throughout the rest of the year, has not been detected during spring. While the daily averaged turbulent energy dissipation in the EUC is weakest during the spring, it is not clear whether the diurnal fluctuations that define the deep cycle cease. Large-eddy simulations are performed using climatological initial and boundary conditions representative of January, April, July, and October. Deep cycle turbulence is evident in all cases; the mechanism remains the same, and the maximum turbulence levels are similar. In the April simulation, however, the deep cycle is confined to the uppermost ~30 m, explaining why it has not been detected in moored microstructure observations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jpo-d-17-0008.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present test uses long-term averages and therefore includes many times when the DC turbulence is expected to be weak or absent, e.g., daytime and spring minima.

    “In contrast, the present test uses long-term averages and therefore includes many times when the DC turbulence is expected to be weak or absent, e.g., daytime and spring minima (Pham et al., 2017;Smyth et al., 2021).”

    From Deep Cycle Turbulence in Atlantic and Pacific Cold Tongues (2022) · cites this paper as Pham et al., 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, H. T., Smyth, W. D., Sarkar, S., & Moum, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Published
2017-09
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
2189-2209
ISSN
  • 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0485
OpenAlex
W2725729834
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (OCE-1355856, OCE-1256620)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
eastern equatorial Pacific, seasonal variation, marginal instability, Richardson number, turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, velocity shear, thermocline, stratification, daily fluctuations, large eddy simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review