Seasonality of Deep Cycle Turbulence in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific
Abstract
The seasonal cycles of the various oceanic and atmospheric factors influencing the deep cycle of turbulence in the eastern Pacific cold tongue are explored. Moored observations at 140°W have shown seasonal variability in the stratification, velocity shear, and turbulence above the Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC). In boreal spring, the thermocline and EUC shoal and turbulence decreases. Marginal instability (clustering of the local gradient Richardson number around the critical value of 1/4), evident throughout the rest of the year, has not been detected during spring. While the daily averaged turbulent energy dissipation in the EUC is weakest during the spring, it is not clear whether the diurnal fluctuations that define the deep cycle cease. Large-eddy simulations are performed using climatological initial and boundary conditions representative of January, April, July, and October. Deep cycle turbulence is evident in all cases; the mechanism remains the same, and the maximum turbulence levels are similar. In the April simulation, however, the deep cycle is confined to the uppermost ~30 m, explaining why it has not been detected in moored microstructure observations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The present test uses long-term averages and therefore includes many times when the DC turbulence is expected to be weak or absent, e.g., daytime and spring minima.
“In contrast, the present test uses long-term averages and therefore includes many times when the DC turbulence is expected to be weak or absent, e.g., daytime and spring minima (Pham et al., 2017;Smyth et al., 2021).”
From Deep Cycle Turbulence in Atlantic and Pacific Cold Tongues (2022) · cites this paper as Pham et al., 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Cycle Turbulence in Atlantic and Pacific Cold Tongues
Moum, J. N., Hughes, K. G., Shroyer, E. L., Smyth, W. D., Cherian, D., Warner, S. J., Bourlès, B., Brandt, P., & Dengler, M. (2022) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl097345 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pham, H. T., Smyth, W. D., Sarkar, S., & Moum, J. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Oceanography
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2189-2209
- ISSN
- 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0485
- OpenAlex
- W2725729834
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (OCE-1355856, OCE-1256620)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- eastern equatorial Pacific, seasonal variation, marginal instability, Richardson number, turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, velocity shear, thermocline, stratification, daily fluctuations, large eddy simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review