Cited by 36Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis

Non-Gaussian Deterministic Assimilation of Radar-Derived Precipitation Accumulations

Open access
Buehner, Mark, Jacques, Dominik·2020·Monthly Weather Review

Abstract

Data assimilation (DA) approaches currently used for operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) generally assume that errors in the background state are Gaussian. At the same time, approaches that make no assumptions regarding the background state probability distribution are gaining attention in research. Most such approaches, including the particle filter, are ensemble DA methods that produce an ensemble of analysis states consistent with the background and observation distributions. The present study instead proposes a non-Gaussian deterministic (NGD) DA method for producing a single deterministic analysis state. Consequently, the usual challenge of maintaining an ensemble with sufficient spread and diversity is avoided. The NGD approach uses background ensembles generated by a standard ensemble Kalman filter. A series of noncycled DA experiments is conducted to evaluate the NGD approach for assimilating precipitation derived from North American weather radars to initialize limited-area deterministic forecasts. The resulting forecasts are compared with those produced using either a local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) deterministic analysis or latent heat nudging (LHN). The experimental results indicate that, for forecast lead times beyond 1.5 h, the NGD approach improves precipitation forecasts relative to LHN. The NGD approach also leads to better temperature and zonal wind forecasts at lead times up to 12 h when compared to those obtained with either LHN or the LETKF. For precipitation, the NGD and LETKF approaches produce forecasts that are of comparable quality. Finally, simple strategies are demonstrated that combine the NGD approach for assimilating radar-derived precipitation accumulations with the ensemble–variational approach for assimilating all other observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/mwr-d-19-0199.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ensemble numerical weather prediction systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data.

    “Ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data [1].”

    From MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model - From Pretraining to Posttraining (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction says precipitation processes can produce highly non-Gaussian relationships, making standard Gaussian data-assimilation approaches potentially less than optimal. It does not establish that ensemble NWP systems generally struggle at zero-to-two-hour lead times or that non-Gaussian assimilation is the primary cause. The Conclusions instead report comparable precipitation-forecast quality from the tested non-Gaussian and LETKF approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Ban, J., Z. Liu, X. Zhang, X.-Y. Huang, and H. Wang, 2017: Precipitation data assimilation in WRFDA 4D-Var: Implementation and application to convection-permitting forecasts over United States. Tellus, 69A, 1368310, https:// doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2017.1368310. · DOI
  2. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3687, in press. · DOI
  3. Bick, T., and Coauthors, 2016: Assimilation of 3D radar re- flectivities with an ensemble Kalman filter on the convective scale. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1490-1504, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/qj.2751. · DOI
  4. Bishop, C. H., 2019: Data assimilation strategies for state-dependent observation error variances. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 217-227, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3424. · DOI
  5. --, B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420-436, https://doi.org/10.1175/ 1520-0493(2001)129,0420:ASWTET.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  6. Bloom, S. C., L. L. Takacs, A. M. da Silva, and D. Ledvina, 1996: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 1256-1271, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996) 124,1256:DAUIAU.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  7. Buehner, M., 2005: Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1013-1043, https:// doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.15. --, J. Morneau, and C. Charette, 2013: Four-dimensional ensemble-variational data assimilation for global determinis- tic weather prediction. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 20, 669-682, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-669-2013. · DOI
  8. --, and Coauthors, 2015: Implementation of deterministic weather forecasting systems based on ensemble-variational data assimilation at Environment Canada. Part I: The global system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2532-2559, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00354. · DOI
  9. Caron, J., and M. Buehner, 2018: Scale-dependent background error covariance localization: Evaluation in a global deter- ministic weather forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 1367-1381, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0369. · DOI
  10. --, T. Milewski, M. Buehner, L. Fillion, M. Reszka, S. Macpherson, and J. St-James, 2015: Implementation of deterministic weather forecasting systems based on ensemble-variational data assim- ilation at Environment Canada. Part II: The regional system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2560-2580, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00353. · DOI
  11. Caumont, O., V. Ducrocq, É. Wattrelot, G. Jaubert, and S. Pradier- Vabre, 2010: 1D13DVar assimilation of radar reflectivity data: A proof of concept. Tellus, 62A, 173-187, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2009.00430.x. · DOI
  12. D'Agostino, R., and E. S. Pearson, 1973: Tests for departure from normality. Biometrika, 60, 613-622, https://doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/60.3.613. · DOI
  13. Dixon, M., Z. Li, H. Lean, N. Roberts, and S. Ballard, 2009: Impact of data assimilation on forecasting convection over the United Kingdom using a high-resolution version of the Met Office Unified Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1562-1584, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/2008MWR2561. · DOI
  14. Duda, J. D., X. Wang, Y. Wang, and J. R. Carley, 2019: Comparing the assimilation of radar reflectivity using the direct GSI-based ensemble-variational (EnVar) and indirect cloud analysis methods in convection-allowing forecasts over the conti- nental United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 1655-1678, https:// doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0171. · DOI
  15. Gao, J., and D. J. Stensrud, 2012: Assimilation of reflectivity data in a convective-scale, cycled 3DVAR framework with hy- drometeor classification. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1054-1065, https:// doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0162. · DOI
  16. --, M. Xue, and D. J. Stensrud, 2013: The development of a hybrid EnKF-3DVAR algorithm for storm-scale data as- similation. Adv. Meteor., 2013, 512656, https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2013/512656. · DOI
  17. Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723-757, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555417. · DOI
  18. Girard, C., and Coauthors, 2014: Staggered vertical discretization of the Canadian Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model using a coordinate of the log-hydrostatic-pressure type. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1183-1196, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-13-00255. · DOI
  19. Gustafsson, N., and Coauthors, 2018: Survey of data assimilation methods for convective-scale numerical weather prediction at operational centres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1218-1256, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3179. · DOI
  20. Hamill, T. H., and J. S. Whitaker, 2001: Distance-dependent filter- ing of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2776-2790, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129,2776:DDFOBE.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  21. Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 2001: A sequential en- semble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 123-137, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520- 0493(2001)129,0123:ASEKFF.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  22. --, M. Buehner, and M. De La Chevrotière, 2019: Using the hybrid gain algorithm to sample data assimilation uncertainty. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 35-56, https://doi.org/10.1002/ qj.3426. · DOI
  23. Hunt, B. R., E. Kostelich, and I. Szunyogh, 2007: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D, 230, 112-126, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2006.11.008. · DOI
  24. Jacques, D., D. Michelson, J.-F. Caron, and L. Fillion, 2018: Latent heat nudging in the Canadian regional deterministic predic- tion system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 3995-4014, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0118. · DOI
  25. Jones, C. D., and B. Macpherson, 1997: A latent heat nudging scheme for assimilation of precipitation data into an operation mesoscale model. Meteor. Appl., 4, 269-277, https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1350482797000522. · DOI
  26. Kawabata, T., T. Kuroda, H. Seko, and K. Saito, 2011: A cloud- resolving 4DVAR assimilation experiment for a local heavy rainfall event in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1911-1931, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011MWR3428. · DOI
  27. Kong, A., J. Liu, and W. Wong, 1994: Sequential imputations and Bayesian missing data problems. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 89, 278-288, https://doi.org/10.2307/2291224. · DOI
  28. Kretschmer, M., B. R. Hunt, and E. Ott, 2015: Data assimilation using a climatologically augmented local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Tellus, 67A, 26617, https://doi.org/10.3402/ tellusa.v67.26617. · DOI
  29. Lopez, P., 2011: Direct 4D-Var assimilation of NCEP stage IV radar and gauge precipitation data at ECMWF. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2098-2116, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3565. · DOI
  30. Lorenc, A. C., 2003: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP-A comparison with 4D-Var. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3183-3203, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.132. · DOI
  31. --, 2017: Improving ensemble covariances in hybrid variational data assimilation without increasing ensemble size. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1062-1072, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2990. · DOI
  32. Mahfouf, J.-F., B. Brasnett, and S. Gagnon, 2007: A Canadian precipitation analysis (CaPA) project: Description and pre- liminary results. Atmos.-Ocean, 45, 1-17, https://doi.org/ 10.3137/ao.v450101. · DOI
  33. Milbrandt, J. A., S. Bélair, M. Faucher, M. Vallée, M. L. Carrera, and A. Glazer, 2016: The Pan-Canadian high resolution (2.5 km) deterministic prediction system. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 1791-1816, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0035. · DOI
  34. Posselt, D. J., and C. H. Bishop, 2018: Nonlinear data assimilation for clouds and precipitation using a gamma inverse-gamma ensemble filter. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2331-2349, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3374. · DOI
  35. Poterjoy, J., and J. L. Anderson, 2016: Efficient assimilation of simulated observations in a high-dimensional geophysical system using a localized particle filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 2007-2020, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0322. · DOI
  36. --, R. A. Sobash, and J. L. Anderson, 2017: Convective-scale data assimilation for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model using the local particle filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 1897-1918, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0298. · DOI
  37. --, L. Wicker, and M. Buehner, 2019: Progress toward the ap- plication of a localized particle filter for numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 1107-1126, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0344. · DOI
  38. Potthast, R., A. Walter, and A. Rhodin, 2019: A localized adaptive particle filter within an operational NWP frame- work. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 345-362, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-18-0028. · DOI
  39. Robert, S., D. Leuenberger, and H. Künsch, 2018: A local en- semble transform Kalman particle filter for convective-scale data assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1279-1296, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3116. · DOI
  40. Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5, 570-575, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0434(1990)005,0570:TCSIAA.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  41. Schraff, C., H. Reich, A. Rhodin, A. Schomburg, K. Stephan, A. Periáñez, and R. Potthast, 2016: Kilometre-scale ensemble data assimilation for the COSMO model (KENDA). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1453-1472, https://doi.org/10.1002/ qj.2748. · DOI
  42. Slivinski, L., E. Spiller, A. Apte, and B. Sandstede, 2015: A hybrid particle-ensemble Kalman filter for Lagrangian data assimi- lation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 195-211, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00051. · DOI
  43. Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical re- trieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642-1661, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054,1642:DAMRFD.2.0.CO;2. --, and Coauthors, 2014: Use of NWP for nowcasting convective precipitation: Recent progress and challenges. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 409-426, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D- 11-00263. · DOI
  44. Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, and M. K. Yau, 2014: On the filtering properties of ensemble averaging for storm-scale precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1093-1105, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00134. · DOI
  45. Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789-1807, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2898. · DOI
  46. Wang, Y., and X. Wang, 2017: Direct assimilation of radar re- flectivity without tangent linear and adjoint of the nonlin- ear observation operator in the GSI-based EnVar system: Methodology and experiment with the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 1447-1471, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0231. · DOI
  47. Wattrelot, E., O. Caumont, and J. Mahfouf, 2014: Operational implementation of the 1D13D-Var assimilation method of radar reflectivity data in the AROME model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1852-1873, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00230. · DOI
  48. Yokota, S., H. Seko, M. Kunii, H. Yamauchi, and E. Sato, 2018: Improving short-term rainfall forecasts by assimilating weather radar reflectivity using additive ensemble perturbations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 9047-9062, https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2018JD028723. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Untitled work

    LLM-Core, X. (2025) · arXiv preprint · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.22724

    “Ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data [1].”

Authors
Buehner, M., & Jacques, D.
Affiliations
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Venue
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2020-01-27
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
783-808
ISSN
  • 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0493
OpenAlex
W2990729349
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Monthly Weather Review (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Keywords
precipitation accumulation, local ensemble transform Kalman filter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review