Non-Gaussian Deterministic Assimilation of Radar-Derived Precipitation Accumulations
Open accessAbstract
Data assimilation (DA) approaches currently used for operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) generally assume that errors in the background state are Gaussian. At the same time, approaches that make no assumptions regarding the background state probability distribution are gaining attention in research. Most such approaches, including the particle filter, are ensemble DA methods that produce an ensemble of analysis states consistent with the background and observation distributions. The present study instead proposes a non-Gaussian deterministic (NGD) DA method for producing a single deterministic analysis state. Consequently, the usual challenge of maintaining an ensemble with sufficient spread and diversity is avoided. The NGD approach uses background ensembles generated by a standard ensemble Kalman filter. A series of noncycled DA experiments is conducted to evaluate the NGD approach for assimilating precipitation derived from North American weather radars to initialize limited-area deterministic forecasts. The resulting forecasts are compared with those produced using either a local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) deterministic analysis or latent heat nudging (LHN). The experimental results indicate that, for forecast lead times beyond 1.5 h, the NGD approach improves precipitation forecasts relative to LHN. The NGD approach also leads to better temperature and zonal wind forecasts at lead times up to 12 h when compared to those obtained with either LHN or the LETKF. For precipitation, the NGD and LETKF approaches produce forecasts that are of comparable quality. Finally, simple strategies are demonstrated that combine the NGD approach for assimilating radar-derived precipitation accumulations with the ensemble–variational approach for assimilating all other observations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ensemble numerical weather prediction systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data.
“Ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data [1].”
From MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model - From Pretraining to Posttraining (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Introduction says precipitation processes can produce highly non-Gaussian relationships, making standard Gaussian data-assimilation approaches potentially less than optimal. It does not establish that ensemble NWP systems generally struggle at zero-to-two-hour lead times or that non-Gaussian assimilation is the primary cause. The Conclusions instead report comparable precipitation-forecast quality from the tested non-Gaussian and LETKF approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Ban, J., Z. Liu, X. Zhang, X.-Y. Huang, and H. Wang, 2017: Precipitation data assimilation in WRFDA 4D-Var: Implementation and application to convection-permitting forecasts over United States. Tellus, 69A, 1368310, https:// doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2017.1368310. · DOI
- Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3687, in press. · DOI
- Bick, T., and Coauthors, 2016: Assimilation of 3D radar re- flectivities with an ensemble Kalman filter on the convective scale. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1490-1504, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/qj.2751. · DOI
- Bishop, C. H., 2019: Data assimilation strategies for state-dependent observation error variances. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 217-227, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3424. · DOI
- --, B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420-436, https://doi.org/10.1175/ 1520-0493(2001)129,0420:ASWTET.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- Bloom, S. C., L. L. Takacs, A. M. da Silva, and D. Ledvina, 1996: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 1256-1271, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996) 124,1256:DAUIAU.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- Buehner, M., 2005: Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1013-1043, https:// doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.15. --, J. Morneau, and C. Charette, 2013: Four-dimensional ensemble-variational data assimilation for global determinis- tic weather prediction. Nonlinear Processes Geophys., 20, 669-682, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-669-2013. · DOI
- --, and Coauthors, 2015: Implementation of deterministic weather forecasting systems based on ensemble-variational data assimilation at Environment Canada. Part I: The global system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2532-2559, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00354. · DOI
- Caron, J., and M. Buehner, 2018: Scale-dependent background error covariance localization: Evaluation in a global deter- ministic weather forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 1367-1381, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0369. · DOI
- --, T. Milewski, M. Buehner, L. Fillion, M. Reszka, S. Macpherson, and J. St-James, 2015: Implementation of deterministic weather forecasting systems based on ensemble-variational data assim- ilation at Environment Canada. Part II: The regional system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2560-2580, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00353. · DOI
- Caumont, O., V. Ducrocq, É. Wattrelot, G. Jaubert, and S. Pradier- Vabre, 2010: 1D13DVar assimilation of radar reflectivity data: A proof of concept. Tellus, 62A, 173-187, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2009.00430.x. · DOI
- D'Agostino, R., and E. S. Pearson, 1973: Tests for departure from normality. Biometrika, 60, 613-622, https://doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/60.3.613. · DOI
- Dixon, M., Z. Li, H. Lean, N. Roberts, and S. Ballard, 2009: Impact of data assimilation on forecasting convection over the United Kingdom using a high-resolution version of the Met Office Unified Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1562-1584, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/2008MWR2561. · DOI
- Duda, J. D., X. Wang, Y. Wang, and J. R. Carley, 2019: Comparing the assimilation of radar reflectivity using the direct GSI-based ensemble-variational (EnVar) and indirect cloud analysis methods in convection-allowing forecasts over the conti- nental United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 1655-1678, https:// doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0171. · DOI
- Gao, J., and D. J. Stensrud, 2012: Assimilation of reflectivity data in a convective-scale, cycled 3DVAR framework with hy- drometeor classification. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1054-1065, https:// doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0162. · DOI
- --, M. Xue, and D. J. Stensrud, 2013: The development of a hybrid EnKF-3DVAR algorithm for storm-scale data as- similation. Adv. Meteor., 2013, 512656, https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2013/512656. · DOI
- Gaspari, G., and S. E. Cohn, 1999: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723-757, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555417. · DOI
- Girard, C., and Coauthors, 2014: Staggered vertical discretization of the Canadian Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model using a coordinate of the log-hydrostatic-pressure type. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1183-1196, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-13-00255. · DOI
- Gustafsson, N., and Coauthors, 2018: Survey of data assimilation methods for convective-scale numerical weather prediction at operational centres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1218-1256, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3179. · DOI
- Hamill, T. H., and J. S. Whitaker, 2001: Distance-dependent filter- ing of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2776-2790, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129,2776:DDFOBE.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 2001: A sequential en- semble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 123-137, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520- 0493(2001)129,0123:ASEKFF.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- --, M. Buehner, and M. De La Chevrotière, 2019: Using the hybrid gain algorithm to sample data assimilation uncertainty. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 35-56, https://doi.org/10.1002/ qj.3426. · DOI
- Hunt, B. R., E. Kostelich, and I. Szunyogh, 2007: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D, 230, 112-126, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2006.11.008. · DOI
- Jacques, D., D. Michelson, J.-F. Caron, and L. Fillion, 2018: Latent heat nudging in the Canadian regional deterministic predic- tion system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 3995-4014, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0118. · DOI
- Jones, C. D., and B. Macpherson, 1997: A latent heat nudging scheme for assimilation of precipitation data into an operation mesoscale model. Meteor. Appl., 4, 269-277, https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1350482797000522. · DOI
- Kawabata, T., T. Kuroda, H. Seko, and K. Saito, 2011: A cloud- resolving 4DVAR assimilation experiment for a local heavy rainfall event in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1911-1931, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011MWR3428. · DOI
- Kong, A., J. Liu, and W. Wong, 1994: Sequential imputations and Bayesian missing data problems. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 89, 278-288, https://doi.org/10.2307/2291224. · DOI
- Kretschmer, M., B. R. Hunt, and E. Ott, 2015: Data assimilation using a climatologically augmented local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Tellus, 67A, 26617, https://doi.org/10.3402/ tellusa.v67.26617. · DOI
- Lopez, P., 2011: Direct 4D-Var assimilation of NCEP stage IV radar and gauge precipitation data at ECMWF. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 2098-2116, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3565. · DOI
- Lorenc, A. C., 2003: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP-A comparison with 4D-Var. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3183-3203, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.132. · DOI
- --, 2017: Improving ensemble covariances in hybrid variational data assimilation without increasing ensemble size. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1062-1072, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2990. · DOI
- Mahfouf, J.-F., B. Brasnett, and S. Gagnon, 2007: A Canadian precipitation analysis (CaPA) project: Description and pre- liminary results. Atmos.-Ocean, 45, 1-17, https://doi.org/ 10.3137/ao.v450101. · DOI
- Milbrandt, J. A., S. Bélair, M. Faucher, M. Vallée, M. L. Carrera, and A. Glazer, 2016: The Pan-Canadian high resolution (2.5 km) deterministic prediction system. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 1791-1816, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0035. · DOI
- Posselt, D. J., and C. H. Bishop, 2018: Nonlinear data assimilation for clouds and precipitation using a gamma inverse-gamma ensemble filter. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2331-2349, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3374. · DOI
- Poterjoy, J., and J. L. Anderson, 2016: Efficient assimilation of simulated observations in a high-dimensional geophysical system using a localized particle filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 2007-2020, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0322. · DOI
- --, R. A. Sobash, and J. L. Anderson, 2017: Convective-scale data assimilation for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model using the local particle filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 1897-1918, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0298. · DOI
- --, L. Wicker, and M. Buehner, 2019: Progress toward the ap- plication of a localized particle filter for numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 1107-1126, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0344. · DOI
- Potthast, R., A. Walter, and A. Rhodin, 2019: A localized adaptive particle filter within an operational NWP frame- work. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 345-362, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-18-0028. · DOI
- Robert, S., D. Leuenberger, and H. Künsch, 2018: A local en- semble transform Kalman particle filter for convective-scale data assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1279-1296, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3116. · DOI
- Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Wea. Forecasting, 5, 570-575, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0434(1990)005,0570:TCSIAA.2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- Schraff, C., H. Reich, A. Rhodin, A. Schomburg, K. Stephan, A. Periáñez, and R. Potthast, 2016: Kilometre-scale ensemble data assimilation for the COSMO model (KENDA). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1453-1472, https://doi.org/10.1002/ qj.2748. · DOI
- Slivinski, L., E. Spiller, A. Apte, and B. Sandstede, 2015: A hybrid particle-ensemble Kalman filter for Lagrangian data assimi- lation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 195-211, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-14-00051. · DOI
- Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical re- trieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642-1661, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054,1642:DAMRFD.2.0.CO;2. --, and Coauthors, 2014: Use of NWP for nowcasting convective precipitation: Recent progress and challenges. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 409-426, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D- 11-00263. · DOI
- Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, and M. K. Yau, 2014: On the filtering properties of ensemble averaging for storm-scale precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1093-1105, https://doi.org/ 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00134. · DOI
- Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789-1807, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2898. · DOI
- Wang, Y., and X. Wang, 2017: Direct assimilation of radar re- flectivity without tangent linear and adjoint of the nonlin- ear observation operator in the GSI-based EnVar system: Methodology and experiment with the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 1447-1471, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0231. · DOI
- Wattrelot, E., O. Caumont, and J. Mahfouf, 2014: Operational implementation of the 1D13D-Var assimilation method of radar reflectivity data in the AROME model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1852-1873, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00230. · DOI
- Yokota, S., H. Seko, M. Kunii, H. Yamauchi, and E. Sato, 2018: Improving short-term rainfall forecasts by assimilating weather radar reflectivity using additive ensemble perturbations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 9047-9062, https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2018JD028723. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLM-Core, X. (2025) · arXiv preprint · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.22724
“Ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems often struggle to deliver accurate precipitation forecasts with a lead time of zero to two hours, primarily due to challenges in assimilating non-Gaussian data [1].”
- Authors
- Buehner, M., & Jacques, D.
- Affiliations
- Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2020-01-27
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 783-808
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W2990729349
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Weather Review (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Keywords
- precipitation accumulation, local ensemble transform Kalman filter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review