Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics and Minimum CRPS Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Ensemble prediction systems typically show positive spread-error correlation, but they are subject to forecast bias and dispersion errors, and are therefore uncalibrated. This work proposes the use of ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), an easy-to-implement postprocessing technique that addresses both forecast bias and underdispersion and takes into account the spread-skill relationship. The technique is based on multiple linear regression and is akin to the superensemble approach that has traditionally been used for deterministic-style forecasts. The EMOS technique yields probabilistic forecasts that take the form of Gaussian predictive probability density functions (PDFs) for continuous weather variables and can be applied to gridded model output. The EMOS predictive mean is a bias-corrected weighted average of the ensemble member forecasts, with coefficients that can be interpreted in terms of the relative contributions of the member models to the ensemble, and provides a highly competitive deterministic-style forecast. The EMOS predictive variance is a linear function of the ensemble variance. For fitting the EMOS coefficients, the method of minimum continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) estimation is introduced. This technique finds the coefficient values that optimize the CRPS for the training data. The EMOS technique was applied to 48-h forecasts of sea level pressure and surface temperature over the North American Pacific Northwest in spring 2000, using the University of Washington mesoscale ensemble. When compared to the bias-corrected ensemble, deterministic-style EMOS forecasts of sea level pressure had root-mean-square error 9% less and mean absolute error 7% less. The EMOS predictive PDFs were sharp, and much better calibrated than the raw ensemble or the bias-corrected ensemble.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · see citing works
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066 · see citing works
Dawid, A. P. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981683 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Richardson, D. S. (2001) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712757715 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Eckel, F. A., 2003: Effective mesoscale, short-range ensemble forecasting. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, 224 pp. [Available online at www.atmos.washington.edu/ ϳens/pubs_n_pres.html.
- --, --, F. Balabdaoui, and A. Westveld, 2003: Verifying probabilistic forecasts: Calibration and sharpness. Proc. Workshop on Ensemble Weather Forecasting in the Short to Medium Range, Val-Morin, QC, Canada. [Available online at www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/tom.hamill/ef_workshop_2003_ schedule.html.]
- --, and --, 2004: Forecasting mesoscale uncertainty: Short- range ensemble forecast error predictability. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 24.3. [Available online at www. atmos.washington.edu/ϳens/pubs_n_pres.html.]
- Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flan- nery, 1992: Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Sci- entific Computing. 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, 963 pp.
- Talagrand, O., R. Vautard, and B. Strauss, 1997: Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems. Proc. Workshop on Predict- ability, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Me- dium-Range Weather Forecasts, 1-25.
- --, O. Talagrand, G. Candille, and Y. Zhu, 2003: Probability and ensemble forecasts. Forecast Verification: A Practitio- ner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, I. T. Jolliffe and D. B. Stephenson, Eds., Wiley, 137-163.
- Unger, D. A., 1985: A method to estimate the continuous ranked probability score. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Probability and Statistics in Atmospheric Sciences, Virginia Beach, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 206-213.
- Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793 · see citing works
Self-citationProbabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
Self-citationWeatherBench 2: A Benchmark for the Next Generation of Data‐Driven Global Weather Models
Rasp, S., Hoyer, S., Merose, A., Langmore, I., Battaglia, P., Russell, T., Sanchez‐Gonzalez, A., Yang, V., Carver, R., Agrawal, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2023ms004019 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Bayesian Modeling of Uncertainty in Ensembles of Climate Models
Smith, R. L., Tebaldi, C., Nychka, D., & Mearns, L. O. (2009) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0007 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., & Stull, R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0057.1 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Ensemble size: How suboptimal is less than infinity?
Leutbecher, M. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.3387 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Skill of Multimodel ENSO Probability Forecasts
Tippett, M. K., & Barnston, A. G. (2008) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/2008mwr2431.1 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Progress and opportunities in advancing near-term forecasting of freshwater quality
Lofton, M. E., Howard, D. W., Thomas, R. Q., & Carey, C. C. (2022) · doi:10.1002/essoar.10512426.1 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gneiting, T., Raftery, A. E., Westveld, A. H., & Goldman, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1098-1118
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W1976255336
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Weather Review (publishedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-01-10745, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- ensemble model output statistics, forecast calibration, continuous ranked probability score, forecast bias correction, underdispersion, probabilistic weather forecasting, sea level pressure, surface temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review