Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems

Open access
Buizza, Roberto, Houtekamer, P. L., Pellerin, Gerald, Toth, Zoltan, Zhu, Yuejian, Wei, Mozheng·2005·Monthly Weather Review

Abstract

The present paper summarizes the methodologies used at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC), and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to simulate the effect of initial and model uncertainties in ensemble forecasting. The characteristics of the three systems are compared for a 3-month period between May and July 2002. The main conclusions of the study are the following:the performance of ensemble prediction systems strongly depends on the quality of the data assimilation system used to create the unperturbed (best) initial condition and the numerical model used to generate the forecasts;a successful ensemble prediction system should simulate the effect of both initial and model-related uncertainties on forecast errors; andfor all three global systems, the spread of ensemble forecasts is insufficient to systematically capture reality, suggesting that none of them is able to simulate all sources of forecast uncertainty.The relative strengths and weaknesses of the three systems identified in this study can offer guidelines for the future development of ensemble forecasting techniques.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/mwr2905.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P. L., Pellerin, G., Toth, Z., Zhu, Y., & Wei, M.
Venue
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2005-05-01
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
1076-1097
ISSN
  • 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0493
OpenAlex
W2133144322
Cited by
630
References
2
FWCI
22.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr2905.1
The paper
Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P. L., Pellerin, G., Toth, Z., Zhu, Y., & Wei, M. (2005). A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr2905.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.