The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects
Open accessAbstract
A new ensemble-based data assimilation method, named the maximum likelihood ensemble filter (MLEF), is presented. The analysis solution maximizes the likelihood of the posterior probability distribution, obtained by minimization of a cost function that depends on a general nonlinear observation operator. The MLEF belongs to the class of deterministic ensemble filters, since no perturbed observations are employed. As in variational and ensemble data assimilation methods, the cost function is derived using a Gaussian probability density function framework. Like other ensemble data assimilation algorithms, the MLEF produces an estimate of the analysis uncertainty (e.g., analysis error covariance). In addition to the common use of ensembles in calculation of the forecast error covariance, the ensembles in MLEF are exploited to efficiently calculate the Hessian preconditioning and the gradient of the cost function. A sufficient number of iterative minimization steps is 2–3, because of superior Hessian preconditioning. The MLEF method is well suited for use with highly nonlinear observation operators, for a small additional computational cost of minimization. The consistent treatment of nonlinear observation operators through optimization is an advantage of the MLEF over other ensemble data assimilation algorithms. The cost of MLEF is comparable to the cost of existing ensemble Kalman filter algorithms. The method is directly applicable to most complex forecast models and observation operators. In this paper, the MLEF method is applied to data assimilation with the one-dimensional Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers equation. The tested observation operator is quadratic, in order to make the assimilation problem more challenging. The results illustrate the stability of the MLEF performance, as well as the benefit of the cost function minimization. The improvement is noted in terms of the rms error, as well as the analysis error covariance. The statistics of innovation vectors (observation minus forecast) also indicate a stable performance of the MLEF algorithm. Additional experiments suggest the amplified benefit of targeted observations in ensemble data assimilation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory
(1970) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(09)x6022-4 · Cited by 7,302
New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory
Kalman, R. E., & Bucy, R. S. (1961) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3658902 · Cited by 6,387
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, L. S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Du Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A., et al. (1999) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719604 · Cited by 4,435
The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation
Evensen, G. (2003) · Ocean Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9 · Cited by 4,420
Levary, R. R. (1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90093-5 · Cited by 4,158
Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage
Nocedal, J. (1980) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1980-0572855-7 · Cited by 2,958
The National Meteorological Center's Spectral Statistical-Interpolation Analysis System
Parrish, D. F., & Derber, J. C. (1992) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1747:tnmcss>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,086
Axelsson, O. (1994) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624100 · Cited by 2,085
Cited by
Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter
Hunt, B. R., Kostelich, E. J., & Szunyogh, I. (2007) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.11.008 · Cited by 1,742
Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., & Evensen, G. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.535 · Cited by 867
An Iterative Ensemble Kalman Filter for Multiphase Fluid Flow Data Assimilation
Gu, Y., & Oliver, D. S. (2007) · SPE Journal · doi:10.2118/108438-pa · Cited by 332
Schuh, A. E., Lauvaux, T., West, T. O., Denning, A. S., Davis, K. J., Miles, N., Richardson, S., Uliasz, M., Lokupitiya, E., Cooley, D., et al. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12141 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Zupanski, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1710-1726
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W1984310153
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/mwr2946.1
- The paper
- Zupanski, M. (2005). Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects. Monthly Weather Review. https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr2946.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.