A Cautionary Note on the Use of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for Normality
Abstract
The Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test is used in many applications for testing normality in climate research. This note shows that the test usually leads to systematic and drastic errors. When the mean and the standard deviation are estimated, it is much too conservative in the sense that its p values are strongly biased upward. One may think that this is a small sample problem, but it is not. There is a correction of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test by Lilliefors, which is in fact sometimes confused with the original Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Both the Jarque–Bera and the Shapiro–Wilk tests for normality are good alternatives to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. A power comparison of eight different tests has been undertaken, favoring the Jarque–Bera and the Shapiro–Wilk tests. The Jarque–Bera and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are also applied to a monthly mean dataset of geopotential height at 500 hPa. The two tests give very different results and illustrate the danger of using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Shapiro-Wilk test provides better power than the K-S test even after the Lilliefors correction.
“The Shapiro-Wilk test is based on the correlation between the data and the corresponding normal scores (10) and provides better power than the K-S test even after the Lilliefors correction (12).”
From Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians (2012) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit
Massey, F. J. (1951) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769 · Cited by 7,210 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012) · International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.5812/ijem.3505 · Cited by 4,368 · see citing works
- Authors
- Steinskog, D. J., Tjøstheim, D. B., & Kvamstø, N. G.
- Affiliations
- Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Venue
- Monthly Weather Review
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1151-1157
- ISSN
- 0027-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0493
- OpenAlex
- W2140945409
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Monthly Weather Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, normality testing, goodness-of-fit tests, test power comparison, Jarque-Bera test, Shapiro-Wilk test, geopotential height, climate data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review