The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information
Abstract
Despite numerous and widespread calls for more “useful” climate-science information to inform policy, most climate science is still produced in a way that is consistent with the “linear model” of research that favors pure basic research over other approaches, resulting in missed opportunities to link useful climate science with decision makers. To improve the ability to adapt to a changing climate, it is necessary to improve the linkages between the production and supply of climate-science information with users’ needs to ensure that the climate science is contextual, credible, trusted, and understood by the users. This paper reports on research that evaluated how three Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) programs produced useful climate information for improved decision support in a variety of sectors. Research indicates that these organizations utilized several processes and approaches to produce useful climate information, including identifying users’ information needs; translating, communicating, and sharing knowledge; producing and situating social capital; building capacity in the user community to understand and utilize the climate-science information; and maintaining a flexible and nimble organization guided by strong leadership. The process of linking the production and supply of climate-science information with users’ demands is a complex, highly contextual social process that requires ample resources and time management, research agendas that are “end to end” and can respond to changing contexts, and organizational commitment to support “use-inspired” research. Additional research is needed to improve evaluation methods and metrics used to assess climate-service organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 2×
“RISAs incorporated ‘‘double-loop learning’’ (Argyris and Schön 1978), or colloquially what can be called ‘‘learning from experience.”
Cited by
Vaughan, C., & Dessai, S. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.290 · Cited by 526
Use‐inspired science: making science usable by and useful to decision makers
Wall, T. U., McNie, E., & Garfin, G. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1735 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McNie, E. C.
- Venue
- Weather, Climate, and Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-26
- ISSN
- 1948-8327 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-8335
- OpenAlex
- W2145421454
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/wcas-d-11-00034.1
- The paper
- McNie, E. C. (2012). Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information. Weather, Climate, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-11-00034.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.